On Sep 13, 2012, at 1:54 PM, Jonas Tehler wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> The plan was to use autoscaling for replacing a node that had failed for some
> reason, not for scaling it up and down based on load. If a node fails I would
> like it replaced as soon as possible and without manual intervention.
Hi
The plan was to use autoscaling for replacing a node that had failed for some
reason, not for scaling it up and down based on load. If a node fails I would
like it replaced as soon as possible and without manual intervention.
But perhaps you are right in that I should do this manually unti
Jonas,
I'd be weary of 'autoscaling' a cluster. While it seems nice in theory,
rebalancing
data when a node is added or removed from the cluster can be expensive.
I'd recommend having a human involved, at least until you have a bit more
experience administering a cluster.
To answer your question
