Re: Accept_failed errors in console.log

2012-07-31 Thread Brian Sparrow
That is a bit small especially if you have a alrge ring size or are doing many concurrent requests. I reommend setting the value much higher to 65536. That should elminate the emfile errors you are seeing. Thanks! Brian Sparrow On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Hal Eisen wrote: > > Brian, > > uli

Re: Accept_failed errors in console.log

2012-07-31 Thread Hal Eisen
Brian, ulimit -n reports 1024. What's a better value? Thanks, Hal On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 11:14:08AM -0700, Hal Eisen wrote: > Thanks, Brian. I'm on CentOS 5.4. > > Hal > > On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 01:58:45PM -0400, Brian Sparrow wrote: > > Hi Hal, > > > > EMFILE errors mean the systme no lo

Re: Accept_failed errors in console.log

2012-07-31 Thread Hal Eisen
Thanks, Brian. I'm on CentOS 5.4. Hal On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 01:58:45PM -0400, Brian Sparrow wrote: > Hi Hal, > > EMFILE errors mean the systme no longer has enough file handles to service > the request. Check the file handles (ulimit -n) for the system as well as > the Riak user and increase

Re: Accept_failed errors in console.log

2012-07-31 Thread Brian Sparrow
Hi Hal, EMFILE errors mean the systme no longer has enough file handles to service the request. Check the file handles (ulimit -n) for the system as well as the Riak user and increase if necessary. I can help you look for these settings, what OS are you running? Thanks, Brian Sparrow On Tue, J