Hi, Mikhail.
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Mikhail Sobolev wrote:
> Thank you for the description. I now wonder if it's possible for a
> map-function instead of returning the whole list of results, do
> something that Riak would take as "ah! another map result, let's do pass
> it to the next
Hi Justin,
On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 10:26:19AM -0400, Justin Sheehy wrote:
> The "map" part of the MapReduce programming paradigm is not only
> inherently parallel, it also does not impose a point of order on the
> overall dataflow and thus does not introduce a concurrency barrier.
> In practical t
Hi, Mikhail.
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 5:55 PM, Mikhail Sobolev wrote:
> Is there more information about "it can through a few keys at a time,
> and the map/reduce chain would go ahead and start doing the
> processing on whatever keys it gets as soon as it gets them, it does
> not have to w
