On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 6:46 PM, Mike Oxford wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 10:56 PM, Mark Phillips wrote:
>>
>> Hi mox,
>>
>> Welcome back. :)
>>
>
> Thanks, good to be back. Been an odd run lately.
>
>>
>> As it stands right now, no. Still plain old boring Riak. If you want
>> custom resolut
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 10:56 PM, Mark Phillips wrote:
> Hi mox,
>
> Welcome back. :)
>
>
Thanks, good to be back. Been an odd run lately.
> As it stands right now, no. Still plain old boring Riak. If you want
> custom resolution logic you'll still be doing that client-side with
> something li
Hi mox,
Welcome back. :)
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Mike Oxford wrote:
> Used to be we had to write "resolvers" due to write-heavy collisions on the
> same kv, to handle the children.
>
> Does Riak have any built-in resolvers (yet?) or is everyone still using
> statebox or something else?
Used to be we had to write "resolvers" due to write-heavy collisions on the
same kv, to handle the children.
Does Riak have any built-in resolvers (yet?) or is everyone still using
statebox or something else?
What's the current state of Riak in this regard, and is there anything in
progress along
