Hey Jan,
I went ahead and filed a ticket to have this code pulled into our java
client. Thanks for sending this over!
You can track it here ---> https://issues.basho.com/show_bug.cgi?id=792
Feel free to make changes or add additional information I may have missed.
Mark
Community Manager
Basho
Patching the java client did the job.
For anyone who is interesed in the patch here are the links:
http://github.com/jmetzner/riak-java-client/commit/61aa7df0a7314a673ca18f286a39108ad2d7
http://github.com/jmetzner/riak-java-client/commit/2910f6f39479866bb7d0e7065257f268a7af35dc
Jan
2010/10/7
300,000 links is probably too large (at least for HTTP). At that scale, I
would consider building tree-like structure where target objects are only
linked off of the leaves of the tree.
Sean Cribbs
Developer Advocate
Basho Technologies, Inc.
http://basho.com/
On Oct 7, 2010, at 9:06 AM, Robin
Jan,
It is possible to do a link phase after a map phase, if your map phase outputs
lists of [bucket,key] pairs. However, the semantics of the link phase will be
to load those specified objects and follow *their* links. If you just want to
extract the links from the body of your first object
What is the hard limit on links, through the REST API?
Would it be possible to have an object with say 300,000 links?
Or is this a terrible idea,
R
On 7 October 2010 13:50, Jan Metzner wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> i am experimenting with riak and have a problem with too many links in a
> riak objec
Hi folks,
i am experimenting with riak and have a problem with too many links in a
riak object.
If i store the object the server send 400 Bad Request. This is caused from
the link header which is too long.
As workaround i thought about storing the links inside the riak object and
fetch them in a m
