View this message in context:
http://riak-users.197444.n3.nabble.com/LevelDB-memory-problem-crashes-Erlang-tp4024974p4025170.html
Sent from the Riak Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.basho.com
nd with the parameters in
order to get better memory allocation, but I would appreciate your advice as
to which parameters affect which function (write throughput, read
throughput, MR latency).
Thanks,
Shahar
--
View this message in context:
http://riak-users.197444.n3.nabble.com/LevelDB-memo
nderstand correctly, is set to 8MB by default which should be
OK).
Thanks,
Shahar
--
View this message in context:
http://riak-users.197444.n3.nabble.com/LevelDB-memory-problem-crashes-Erlang-tp4024974p4025168.html
Sent from the Riak Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.basho.com
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
eads_enabled : true
> sys_thread_pool_size : 64
> sys_wordsize : 4
> ring_members : ['riak@127.0.0.1']
> ring_num_partitions : 64
> ring_ownership : <<"[{'riak@127.0.0.1',64}]">>
> ring_creation_size : 64
> storage_backend : riak_kv_eleve
k@127.0.0.1',64}]">>
ring_creation_size : 64
storage_backend : riak_kv_eleveldb_backend
riak_api_version : <<"1.2.0">>
(...)
I'm running a single riak node with "n_val=1", "allow_mult=false" and
"last_write_wins=true".
Is there any erlang configuration that I am missing ou doing wrong?
Thanks for the help!
Leo
--
View this message in context:
http://riak-users.197444.n3.nabble.com/LevelDB-memory-problem-crashes-Erlang-tp4024974p4025155.html
Sent from the Riak Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.basho.com
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
-10-generic-pae #46-Ubuntu SMP Tue Jun 28 16:54:49
UTC 2011 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
Thks!
--
View this message in context:
http://riak-users.197444.n3.nabble.com/LevelDB-memory-problem-crashes-Erlang-tp4024974p4024991.html
Sent from the Riak Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
and got the same behavior);
>> - ring_creation_size = 64
>> - allow_mult = false;
>> - last_write_wins = true;
>> - r = 1;
>> - w = 1;
>>
>> I've done the same test using bitcask configuration and works fine, i could
>> put all my 10 million keys.
&
last_write_wins = true;
> - r = 1;
> - w = 1;
>
> I've done the same test using bitcask configuration and works fine, i could
> put all my 10 million keys.
>
> Can anyone help me with this?
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Leo
>
>
>
>
> --
>
this?
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Leo
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://riak-users.197444.n3.nabble.com/LevelDB-memory-problem-crashes-Erlang-tp4024974.html
> Sent from the Riak Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> __
--
View this message in context:
http://riak-users.197444.n3.nabble.com/LevelDB-memory-problem-crashes-Erlang-tp4024974.html
Sent from the Riak Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.basho.com
http
10 matches
Mail list logo
