t; ** **
>
> *From:* OJ Reeves [mailto:o...@buffered.io]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 9, 2013 5:28 PM
> *To:* Pandiarajan Subramani
> *Cc:* riak-users@lists.basho.com
> *Subject:* Re: Corrugated Iron for Riak- WCF Performance Issue
>
> ** **
>
> oops! hit send too ear
red.io]
Sent: Wednesday, October 9, 2013 5:28 PM
To: Pandiarajan Subramani
Cc: riak-users@lists.basho.com
Subject: Re: Corrugated Iron for Riak- WCF Performance Issue
oops! hit send too early.
4. What is your Riak cluster setup? (eg. how many nodes, configuration
setteings, etc).
We have 4
I'm not a Corrugated Iron user so this is more of a shot in the dark:
Have you bumped the maxConnection setting for .NET? This setting defaults to a
_very_ low value and can really ruin your day, especially on earlier versions
of the framework.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/fb6y0fyc.as
oops! hit send too early.
4. What is your Riak cluster setup? (eg. how many nodes, configuration
setteings, etc).
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 9:26 AM, OJ Reeves wrote:
> Pandiarajan,
>
> Can you please answer some questions for me:
>
>1. What is your application architecture? Are you consuming
Pandiarajan,
Can you please answer some questions for me:
1. What is your application architecture? Are you consuming CI as a
transport from WCF or are you calling CI from a RESTful server?
2. Prior to adding CI, how were you talking to Riak?
3. Have you ran basho_bench against your a
Hi Everyone,
I am using Corrugated Iron(CI) for Riak in my WCF
REST application. After adding CI, the web services started to send response
very slow. All immediate consecutive request to the REST end points get queued
up and the responses are delayed more. If anyone ha
