Correct. Thanks for clarifying, Reid.
Mark
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 5:34 AM, Reid Draper wrote:
>
> On Jan 24, 2012, at 10:02 PM, Mark Phillips wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Nicholas Young
>> wrote:
>>> Unless something has changed drastically, only LevelDB supports secondary
>>>
On Jan 24, 2012, at 10:02 PM, Mark Phillips wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Nicholas Young
> wrote:
>> Unless something has changed drastically, only LevelDB supports secondary
>> indexes:
>> http://lists.basho.com/pipermail/riak-users_lists.basho.com/2011-September/005839.html
>> __
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Nicholas Young
wrote:
> Unless something has changed drastically, only LevelDB supports secondary
> indexes: http://lists.basho.com/pipermail/riak-users_lists.basho.com/2011-September/005839.html
> ___
This is true, but
Unless something has changed drastically, only LevelDB supports secondary
indexes:
http://lists.basho.com/pipermail/riak-users_lists.basho.com/2011-September/005839.html
___
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.basho.com
http://lists.basho.com/mailman
Charlies,
Upgrading riaks version or switching the the storage backend is typically
best down by rolling in the new servers then rolling out the old servers.
This takes a while but keeps you downtime at ~0. After the old servers are
removed you should be able to start using the riak's newest power
I've been using Riak for a few weeks now. I'm using the PHP API Client
(http://basho.github.com/riak-php-client/).
I noticed it was giving me errors when I tried to add indexes, so I changed the
backend from bitcask to leveldb (Does bitcask not allow indexing i.e. for
secondary indexes?). So
