Re: deleting a document from Yokozuna index with Ruby client?

Thanks Tom - that makes sense! Paul --- Paul Walk http://www.paulwalk.net --- > On 14 Apr 2014, at 18:37, Tom Santero wrote: > > Hi Paul, > > Deleting a key in Riak will result it being removed fr

deleting a document from Yokozuna index with Ruby client?

I cannot see how one should delete a document from a Yokozuna index with the Ruby client. The 'remove' method of the 'client' object has disappeared in the latest version of the client... Can anyone advise? Paul --- Paul Walk htt

Re: deleting CRDT objects with the ruby client?

ally interested in Riak for its flexibility rather than for its resilience, which I realise may be a bit perverse). So far, I'm really liking 2.0 :-) Thanks, Paul On 9 Apr 2014, at 17:05, Bryce Kerley wrote: > On 9 Apr 2014, at 3:59, Paul Walk wrote: > > However, the only avail

deleting CRDT objects with the ruby client?

the bucket-typed one. Can anyone advise? Thanks, Paul --- Paul Walk http://www.paulwalk.net --- ___ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http

Re: CRDT objects and 2i?

nstead recommend enabling Riak Search 2.0 > as this supports querying CRDTs through Solr. > > Best regards, > > Christian > > > On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 6:39 AM, Paul Walk wrote: > I’m still a little unclear on the relationship between CRDT, K/V objects and > bucke

CRDT objects and 2i?

my_bucket.get_index('$key','0'..'',{:bucket_type=> my_map_bucket_type}).size returns ‘0’. I suspect I am misunderstanding something fundamental - can anyone advise? Thanks, Paul -------

Re: link walking in the Riak 2.0 Ruby client?

ation > layer, not the database layer. > > Thanks! > -Casey > > > On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 8:12 AM, Paul Walk wrote: > Thanks - this is somewhat reassuring (the ability to do some basic graph-like > operations is one reason I have been using Riak). > > I have s

link walking in the Riak 2.0 Ruby client?

'map' objects, when I discovered that the link-walking functions appear to have been removed from the latest Ruby client!! Is link-walking deprecated and intentionally removed from Riak version 2.0? Or is it just missing from the Ruby client? Paul --

Re: link walking in the Riak 2.0 Ruby client?

; > Christian > > > On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 2:56 PM, Paul Walk wrote: > I'm gradually getting up to speed with the technical release of Riak 2.0, and > am appreciating CRDT and the seamless integration into search. > > I had just turned my attention to links, and st

Re: link walking in the Riak 2.0 Ruby client?

ffers which on the Riak PB > API side never had that functionality directly. > > It is still possible to perform the operation, you just have to do it > through map-reduce (which is what our clients have always done when > using PB) > > Thanks, > - Roach > > On Tue, M

Re: updating the default bucket-type to support Solr indexing?

> On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 12:33 PM, Paul Walk wrote: > Thanks Luke. > > If I might be allowed a follow-on question, what is the effect of adding an > index to a 'typed bucket-type'. For example, if I define a bucket_type as > follows: > > ./riak-

Re: updating the default bucket-type to support Solr indexing?

uke Bakken wrote: > Hi Paul, > > You are correct, a new bucket type must be created for Riak 2.0 search > indexes. > > -- > Luke Bakken > CSE > lbak...@basho.com > > > On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 2:27 AM, Paul Walk wrote: > I'm experimenting with the

updating the default bucket-type to support Solr indexing?

bucket type default: no_default_update Does this mean that in Riak 2.0, if one wants buckets to be indexed in Solr, one must create a new bucket_type in order to associate an index and then associate buckets with this? Thanks, Paul --