;-int" then it isn't a
> fully qualified domain name and therefore Erlang complains.
>
> Hopefully that clears up the confusion.
>
>
> On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 8:12 PM, Mike Nathe wrote:
>
>> Hi Alex.
>>
>> thanks a bunch for the info and the link to
Hi.
we are load testing Riak 1.4.2 in the amazon cloud (8 nodes: c1.xlarge + 1
ebs) at the moment and plan to go into production early next year.
So far things have been going pretty well and we increased the load and the
total time of the load tests almost weekly.
The current target is a 24 hour
should prevent you from having to
> do renames/changing ips in the config files.
> If you do this, please consider using a VPC to limit access to the
> machines.
>
> A good resource to read over is Amazon's Riak Whitepaper:
> http://media.amazonwebservices.com/AWS_NoSQL_Riak.
hi.
we are trying to run Riak in the Amazon cloud (using OpsWorks).
With every restart of the servers the ip addresses change so using an entry
in the /etc/hosts instead of an IP looks like a great idea.
Google's answer is:
http://lists.basho.com/pipermail/riak-users_lists.basho.com/2011-December
hi.
we are trying to run Riak in the Amazon cloud (using OpsWorks).
With every restart of the servers the ip addresses change so using an entry
in the /etc/hosts instead of an IP looks like a great idea.
Google's answer is:
http://lists.basho.com/pipermail/riak-users_lists.basho.com/2011-December
