You might try emailing the port maintainer directly:
cd /usr/ports/databases/riak && make maintainer
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Allen Landsidel
wrote:
> Straightening that out (cookie dir permissions issue), it starts and stops
> now normally, but the startup still says it failed with r
As you know, but I'll just say it again here publicly, Voxer uses a whole
lot of node.js with Riak. We are using a custom client that's on the track
to be open sourced soon.
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 11:41 PM, Mark Phillips wrote:
> I need a bit if help. I'm trying to get an impression of how many
The 2i features are certainly more convenient than building secondary
indexes manually, which is the only alternative until now. I'm a little
concerned about the performance of the coverage queries as our cluster
grows. Building a secondary index manually does scale very nicely as new
nodes are a
That's really cool. I'm glad you guys spent time making sure that rolling
upgrades work smoothly.
Is there any surprising behavior to look out for while the cluster has some
new and some old nodes?
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Joseph Blomstedt wrote:
> Each 0.14.2 is upgraded to a 1.0 nod
These new clustering changes sounds excellent.
Will we still be able to do a rolling upgrade from 0.14.2?
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Joseph Blomstedt wrote:
> Given that 1.0 prerelease packages are now available, I wanted to
> mention some changes to Riak's clustering capabilities in 1.0.
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Wilson MacGyver wrote:
> it's been working fine. but lately, as traffic begin to increase, we
> started seeing time out errors
> on the map reduce call. the strange thing is, if I issue GET on each
> key, results are coming back
> without any problem.
>
We've fou
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> The main point of memcache is that it is distributed and the clients
> automatically handle failover at any reasonably large scale. How do you
> arrange that with redis?
>
You can achieve this with Redis with a little bit of client-side mag
Are you sure you want this? Riak will spread your data across all nodes in
the cluster with no consideration for the network topology.
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 6:40 PM, Jeremy Bornstein wrote:
> We have machines in different data centers and no VPN between them. I'm
> a little confused by the d
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 8:10 PM, Antonio Rohman Fernandez <
roh...@mahalostudio.com> wrote:
> what if apart from webservers with a web-app i want to build
> iPhone/iPad/Android apps that access Riak directly?
Unfortunately, Riak just isn't designed for that. You might be able to work
around it
Since everything gets passed into JS as JSON, using a VM with native JSON
parsing should be a big win.
Have you gotten any attention from the Mozilla people about the Solaris
issue? They seem pretty eager to have their JS engine running in as many
places as they can.
It's more than a little disa
Are there plans to update the JavaScript VM used by Riak in upcoming
releases? Native JSON and tracing in recent Mozilla releases ought to
provide a big performance boost for map/reduce that uses JavaScript
functions.
___
riak-users mailing list
riak-use
I'm using Riak Search 0.14.0-1, and it seems like JSON docs with otherwise
legal \r characters in them confuse both the search indexer and JSON.parse()
from within JavaScript map functions. Presumably these two are related.
After looking around, it sounds like maybe this has been fixed, but perha
12 matches
Mail list logo
