Re: Proposal for chunked storage (related to Lowlevel Access to RiakCS objects)

2014-04-02 Thread Martin Alpers
> Timo > >   > > ___ > riak-users mailing list > riak-users@lists.basho.com > http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com > ___ > riak-users mailing list > riak-use

Re: Lowlevel Access to RiakCS objects?

2014-03-29 Thread Martin Alpers
> > > On Mar 28, 2014, at 10:53 AM, Martin Alpers wrote: > > > > Thanks for your answer, Tom. > > > > I wanted to avoid the overhead of one segemting layers whose objects are > > segmented by yet another layer, but come to think of it, since Riak c

Re: Lowlevel Access to RiakCS objects?

2014-03-28 Thread Martin Alpers
you to seed varnish, while at the same time reducing the cost of a cache > miss to something reasonable for users. > > Regards, > Tom > > On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Martin Alpers wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > is there a canonical way to access

Lowlevel Access to RiakCS objects?

2014-03-27 Thread Martin Alpers
just came across the memory backend. I assume it is distributed like the persistent ones, so it will not help me redice internal traffic, right? Any input is highly appreciated. Best Regards Martin -- Greetings, Martin Alpers martin-alp...@web.de; Public Key ID: 10216CFB Tel: +49 431/90885691; Mobi

Download stops at certain megabyte boundary (RiakCS)

2013-09-04 Thread Martin Alpers
n 6 (Squeeze) To meet dependencies, libssl0.9.8 from Squeeze was installed using dpkg -i (Wheezy "only" has libssl1.0.0, which does not satisfy said dependency.) Big thanks to anyone who has a look at my problems. Any help is highly appreciated and I will gladly provide any informati