not self healing?
Cheers
Simon
On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 07:55:53PM +, Effenberg, Simon wrote:
>The repair worked..
>Total 2 items scanned: 12961170
>Total tree objects: 9258332
>Total objects fixed: 538423
>So it seems that it had to fix a lot. But sh
The repair worked..
Total 2 items scanned: 12961170
Total tree objects: 9258332
Total objects fixed: 538423
So it seems that it had to fix a lot. But shouldn't this be impossible with AAE
enabled?
Von Samsung Mobile gesendet
Ursprüngliche Nachricht
Von: "Effenb
ybe it will break.. I'm looking forward.
Cheers
Simon
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 08:24:44AM +, Effenberg, Simon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> any updates on this issue? I'm still able to search a range of 2i and
> I'm getting 3 results.. 0, 557 and 13853 :(..
>
> I cannot rely o
Hi,
any updates on this issue? I'm still able to search a range of 2i and
I'm getting 3 results.. 0, 557 and 13853 :(..
I cannot rely on 2i right now nor can I repair it.
Cheers
Simon
On Fri, Aug 08, 2014 at 07:12:58AM +, Effenberg, Simon wrote:
> Hi Bryan,
>
> thanks f
Hi Bryan,
thanks for this. I tried it but to be honest I cannot see any specific
stuff in the logs (on the specific host).
I attached the logfile from the specific node. If you think it is
also/more important to look into the logfiles on the other nodes I can
send them as well.. but a quick look
ions/#Monitoring-Repairs
>
> Repairs can also be monitored using the `riak-admin transfers` command.
>
> http://docs.basho.com/riak/1.4.9/ops/running/recovery/repairing-partitions/#Running-a-Repair
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Bryan Hunt
>
> Bryan Hunt - Client Services
> Bryan Hunt
>
> Bryan Hunt - Client Services Engineer - Basho Technologies Limited -
> Registered Office - 8 Lincoln’s Inn Fields London WC2A 3BP Reg 07970431
>
> On 6 Aug 2014, at 12:53, Effenberg, Simon wrote:
>
> > Hi E
>wrote:
>
> Hi Simon,
> Sorry for the delays. I'm on vacation for a couple of days. Will pick
> this up on Monday.
>
> Cheers
> Russell
> On 1 Aug 2014, at 09:56, Effenberg, Simon
> wrote:
>
> > Hi R
, Jul 30, 2014 at 09:22:56AM +, Effenberg, Simon wrote:
> Great. Thanks Russell..
>
> if you need me to do something.. feel free to ask.
>
> Cheers
> Simon
>
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 10:19:56AM +0100, Russell Brown wrote:
> > Thanks Simon,
> >
> >
Great. Thanks Russell..
if you need me to do something.. feel free to ask.
Cheers
Simon
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 10:19:56AM +0100, Russell Brown wrote:
> Thanks Simon,
>
> I’m going to spend a some time on this day.
>
> Cheers
>
> Russell
>
> On 30 Jul 2014, at 10:
o
eleveldb:async_get(#Ref<0.0.2698.198008>, <<>>,
<<131,104,2,109,0,0,0,20,99,111,110,118,101,114,115,97,116,105,111,110,95,115,101,99,114,101,116,...>>,
[]) in eleveldb:get/3 line 143 in gen_server:terminate/6 line 747
2014-07-30 06:16:09.154 UTC [error] <0.
I tried it now with one partition on 6 different machines and everywhere the
same result: index_scan_timeout and the info: bad argument in call to
eleveldb:async_get (2x) or async_write (4x).
Von Samsung Mobile gesendet
Ursprüngliche Nachricht
Von: "Effenberg, Simon&q
this is not a disk corruption issue..
Simon
Von Samsung Mobile gesendet
Ursprüngliche Nachricht
Von: bryan hunt
Datum:29.07.2014 18:21 (GMT+01:00)
An: "Effenberg, Simon"
Cc: riak-users@lists.basho.com
Betreff: Re: repair-2i stops with "bad argument in call to eleve
Said to say but the issue stays the same.. even after the upgrade to
1.4.10.
Any ideas what is happening here?
Cheers
Simon
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 08:46:42AM +, Effenberg, Simon wrote:
> Already started to prepare everything for it.. :)
>
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 09:43:22AM +01
othing
> major changed, just bug fixes, here is the release notes' link for
> reference:
>
> https://github.com/basho/riak/blob/1.4/RELEASE-NOTES.md
>
> Best regards,
>
> Guido.
>
> On 29/07/14 09:35, Effenberg, Simon wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >
One thing I realized right now.. the new node is on wheezy whereas all
other 12 nodes are running squeeze.. but shouldn't be a problem, right?
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 08:35:15AM +0000, Effenberg, Simon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we have some issues with 2i queries like that:
>
>
Hi,
we have some issues with 2i queries like that:
seffenberg@kriak46-1:~$ while :; do curl -s
localhost:8098/buckets/conversation/index/createdat_int/0/23182680 | ruby
-rjson -e "o = JSON.parse(STDIN.read); puts o['keys'].size"; sleep 1; done
13853
13853
0
557
557
557
13853
0
...
So I trie
Hi,
can I somehow access/format the
/var/lib/riak/anti_entropy//MANIFEST-X file easily so that I
get all bucket/keys out of it? I would like to get somehow all existing
keys (since the last AAE was build on this vnode) without trying to get
it out of the cluster via HTTP /buckets/bucket/keys?k
Hi,
we want to save plenty of mails in riak which are in average 14k big. Our
cluster will become between 10 to 20 nodes so the question is: what is better,
having more partitions but each has less cache or is it the other way around so
having less partitions with more cache size?
Also with an
19 matches
Mail list logo
