related to the "extra
overhead" of using of the SpiderMonkey JavaScript engine, but I would need to
do more testing to come to a more firm conclusion.
David
-Original Message-
From: Mathias Meyer [mailto:math...@basho.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 4:25 AM
To: David M
Message-
From: Mathias Meyer [mailto:math...@basho.com]
Sent: Friday, June 24, 2011 3:37 PM
To: David Mitchell
Cc: riak-users@lists.basho.com
Subject: Re: Mysterious JavaScript MapReduce crashes and timeouts with 0.14.2
David,
given your description of the error behaviour and the MapReduce job
I just reran the 208 MapReduce jobs, and I got two timeouts (but no crashes).
They were both in the map phase.
=ERROR REPORT 24-Jun-2011::15:23:27 ===
** State machine <0.4087.0> terminating
** Last event in was {mapexec_error,{157389,'riak@10.0.60.210'},
I am doing 208 MapReduce jobs in rapid-fire succession using anonymous
JavaScript functions. I am sending the MapReduce jobs to a single node,
riak01. There are about 75,000 keys in the bucket.
Erlang: R13B04
Riak: 0.14.2
When I had my MapReduce timeout set to 120,000 ("timeout":12), I was
As Nico suggests below, although this is not an elegant solution, I would be
satisfied with causing the deletes to fail unless all primary nodes are up.
On 6/16/2011 12:09 PM, Nico Meyer wrote:
> If all primary nodes are up, the problem is nonexistent. You could
> certainly implement any number
{state,true,
{javascript,
{map,
{jsanon,
<<"function(value,keyData,arg){var
David
From: David Mitchell
Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2011 5:10 PM
To: 'riak-users@lists.basho.com'
Subject: Re: R
Erlang: R13B04
Riak: 0.14.2
I am having the same issue as Jeremy.
I just did 208 MapReduce jobs using anonymous JavaScript functions in the map
and reduce phases. I am sending the MapReduce jobs to a single node, riak01.
Out of the 208 jobs, I got two "mapexec_error" {error,timeout} on riak02
Erlang: R13B04
Riak: 0.14.2
I have a three node cluster, and while one node was down, I deleted every key
in a certain bucket. Then, I started the node that was down, and it joined the
cluster.
Now, when do a listing on these keys in this bucket, and I get the entire list.
I can also get the
t",
"arg" : null,
"source" :
"function (v) { return [Riak.mapValuesJson(v)[0]]; }"
}
The "and" based key filter is not working for me either. See:
http://lists.basho.com/pipermail/riak-users_lists.basho.com/2011-June/004432.html
David
___
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.basho.com
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-u
Can someone confirm that the logical AND operation used with tokenize does not
work? According to the website (http://wiki.basho.com/Key-Filters.html), it
should work, but it does not work for me.
David
From: David Mitchell
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2011 6:41 PM
To: 'riak-
I am trying to use the following Key-Filters with logical AND operation and
tokenize, but I am getting errors. Anyone know what might be wrong? Is it
possible to use tokenize with the logical AND?
Erlang: R13B04
Riak: 0.14.2
Bucket: zip
Key: 22305-0-1-3
The following does not work:
{
Hi Dan,
There are no other beam processes running. The only thing running that is
related to riak is "riak/erts-5.7.5/bin/epmd -daemon".
David
From: Dan Reverri [mailto:d...@basho.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2011 12:37 PM
To: David Mitchell
Cc: riak-users@lists.basho.com
Subject
Hi, one of the riak nodes is not starting. I am getting
{badmatch,already_exists} in sasl-error.log.
At first, I was getting 'eaccess' errors, so I changed all of the files to be
owned by "root:root". Now, I am getting,
{badmatch,already_exists}.
In, erlang.log.1, I see:
[{application,riak_k
14 matches
Mail list logo
