Re: [ANN] Riak 2.0.0

Very exciting news! Can't wait to start playing with it. > El Sep 2, 2014, a las 10:30 PM, Alex De la rosa > escribió: > > Awesome! Thank you very much! > > Alex > > >> On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 11:53 PM, Alexander Sicular >> wrote: >> Congrats to the whole Basho team. Great achievement! -Ale

Riak returning no objects when an object should exist

Hi all, We are seeing a situation where reading a key that is known to exist returns no value. The bucket properties are as follows: {"props":{"allow_mult":false,"basic_quorum":false,"big_vclock":50,"chash_keyfun":{"mod":"riak_core_util","fun":"chash_std_keyfun"},"dw":"quorum","last_write_wins":t

+stbt nnts

Hi all, I am trying to set the Erlang scheduler bind type to nnts by adding the following to vm.args: +stbt nnts In theory stbt is supposed to handle lack of support properly, but instead my server fails to start. However it starts with just +sbt nnts. Here is the Erlang doc on the flag: http:/

Sibling Explosion

Hi all, I had a bug in my ingestion code that caused sibling explosion in a specific bucket. I have temporarily turned off allow_mult=true until that bug is fixed. Is there a way to remove all of the siblings on those existing massive objects (up to 10MB) now that allow_mult is false? Will Riak do

Re: Cost of many PBC connections held open?

Hi Toby, It should be fine to keep many connections PCB connections open. To give you an idea, we connect to a nine (9) node cluster over Protobuf, with up to 2k concurrent connections per node. Cheers, Alain On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 10:44 PM, Toby Corkindale wrote: > Hi, > Just looking for a

Re: Upgraded riak 1.4.9 is pegging the CPU

t_it/6 line 328 Bollocks! On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Alain Rodriguez wrote: > Thanks for the quick reply and no I did not. Is this something I should be > able to do now (stop, remove files, start again) or is it too late? How > could I verify this is the issue? > > > On Thu,

Re: Upgraded riak 1.4.9 is pegging the CPU

Thanks for the quick reply and no I did not. Is this something I should be able to do now (stop, remove files, start again) or is it too late? How could I verify this is the issue? On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 8:42 AM, Shane McEwan wrote: > On 05/06/14 16:20, Alain Rodriguez wrote: > &g

Upgraded riak 1.4.9 is pegging the CPU

Hi all, I upgraded 1 of 9 riak nodes in a cluster last night from 1.4.0 to 1.4.9. The rest are running 1.4.0. Ever since I am seeing the upgraded node, riak01 consuming a significantly larger percent of CPU and the PUT times on it have gotten worse. htop indicicates one particular process pegging

How to determine pb_backlog?

Hi all, Can anyone share some wisdom on what to set pb_backlog to? Is there some kind of formula based on the number of requests/s? I am seeing a ton of connection timeouts when I restart my application and I have pb_backlog set to the default of 5. Thanks, Alain ___

Re: Riak startup issue

Hi John, What node name are you using in vm.args? If you are using a FQDN, try setting it to riak@ instead and see if that resolves the startup issue. Either way, what's the exact error being logged by the riak server? Alain On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 4:14 PM, John Kavanagh wrote: > Hi all, > > I

Re: Riak in Node + Protobuf

, this might be a problem in the library. > Can you post the code you are using? > > > On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 12:04 AM, Alain Rodriguez wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> I am trying to connect to Riak using the Node.js library >> https://github.com/nlf/riakpbc

Riak in Node + Protobuf

Hi all, I am trying to connect to Riak using the Node.js library https://github.com/nlf/riakpbc, however many of my connections are failing with the error "Connection timeout". Is there a limit on the number of connections allowed over PB? I looked into tuning pb_backlog but it didn't yield any re