That's what I get for doing things from memory and not running the
simulator :)
I think you're right about the actual operation of the preference lists -
but i haven't had a chance to look over the code or run some simulations.
The effect isn't quite as severe, but as you say unevenly loads the clu
Jon,
With regards to this snippet below, I think I get your point, but I don't
think the example is valid:
>>>
If with N=3 if a node goes down, all of the responsibility for that
node is shift to another single node in the cluster.
n1 | n2 | n3 | n4 | n1 | n2 | n3 | n4(Q=8 S=4,TargetN4)
