Hello,
Thank you all and sorry for replying so late.
W=2 works.
"allow_mult" is not suitable for me. Because sibling affects results of
Yokozuna search.
> Also, to make sure your data eventually consistent, R+W
> should be > N. Your case is 1+1, not >2.
Right. I'm not indended but, I can't ch
Hello there,
i have problems with my riak-cs cluster.
i have 5 riak nodes, each node have 11 TB of storage.
my riak-cs deployment is just following 5 minutes installation tutorial.
but, after running for 1 month. surprisingly, i have storage problem.
my bitcask folder (/data/riak/bitcask) is sto
Hi Jon
Thanks for confirming this.
We did do plan/commit and everything worked as expected, no issues
whatsoever
Thanks a bunch
Daniel
--
View this message in context:
http://riak-users.197444.n3.nabble.com/Node-join-not-committed-tp4033571p4033573.html
Sent from the Riak Users mailing list a
Hi Daniel,
It's perfectly safe to issue the cluster plan/commit steps. Joining the
node gives it information about where data is located in the rest of the
cluster and it will happily coordinate gets, but the new node will always
forward put requests and will not store any data until you go throu
Hi
Our attach script failed and it only issued *cluster join*
but not *cluster plan* and *cluster commit*.
so the node was visible as joining in member_status
Since then both part (original cluster and new node) were taking writes but
in our configuration each node takes writes from it local proc
