riak_core 2.0.0rc1

Hello, What is the status of riak_core in 2.0.0rc1? Is it resonable to start using it instead of 1.4.10 for production? Or are there big changes pending till the final release? Karolis ___ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists

Re: riak 2.0 - java client 'unavailable' exception

Furthermore, you should almost never use the 'ASIS' option. It does not mean what you think it means (and probably means nothing to strong consistency). On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 6:55 PM, Joseph Blomstedt wrote: > This means the consistency sub-system is not enabled/active. You can > verify this

Re: riak 2.0 - java client 'unavailable' exception

This means the consistency sub-system is not enabled/active. You can verify this with the output of `riak-admin ensemble-status`. To enable strong consistency you must: 1) Set 'strong_consistency = on' in riak.conf. 2) Have at least a 3 node cluster. You can address #2 by setting up 3+ local dev

riak 2.0 - java client 'unavailable' exception

Hi, I am trying out 2.0 w/ just one local node, created a strongly consistent bucket type. But keep getting below exception. If I just use the default bucket type, everything works fine. Here is the bucket type detail with consistency bit on. young_vclock: 20 w: quorum small_vclock: 50 rw: quo

Re: Too many siblings error

Hi Bryce, Single node? I’m pretty surprised by this, in 1.4 every write to a counter resolves the siblings at the coordinating vnode. Do you know what your sibling limit is set too? How are you typically using counters in your application? Are you reusing the same bucket/key for non-counter obj

Re: Issues with high node load and very slow response

Chaim, >From the output you provided I think the handoff issue a symptom of the CPU usage (the check that is performed is failing to complete before timing out) . Could you run `riak-debug` on the nodes (or at least the ones with high CPU usage) and make the archives available to me for download.

Too many siblings error

Hi, In my application I'm using riak counters, but in the very recent past I saw a large number of these show up in the console logs: <0.1432.0>@riak_kv_vnode:encode_and_put:1795 Too many siblings for object <<"BUCKET">>/<<"KEY">> Are there known limitations to how many siblings can be creat

Re: Issues with high node load and very slow response

adding the list back On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 8:50 AM, Jordan West wrote: > On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 7:43 AM, Chaim Solomon > wrote: >> >> I'm getting lots of these still: >> 2014-07-28 10:40:52.915 [info] <0.822.0>@yz_kv:should_handoff:157 waiting >> for bucket types prefix and indexes to agree

Re: Python Client for 2.0rc1

Hi Sean, Cool! good to know it seems is going to be something out there soon :) Thanks! Alex On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Sean Cribbs wrote: > Hi Alex, > > We're trying to finish up one or two more issues, then we'll release a > preview to PyPi. Hang in there. > > > On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 a

Re: Python Client for 2.0rc1

Hi Alex, We're trying to finish up one or two more issues, then we'll release a preview to PyPi. Hang in there. On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Alex De la rosa wrote: > Hi there, > > Is there any estimate time for the Python Client to be released so we can > use Counters, Sets, Maps, etc...

Python Client for 2.0rc1

Hi there, Is there any estimate time for the Python Client to be released so we can use Counters, Sets, Maps, etc... properly? Thanks! Alex ___ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.b

Re: Issues with high node load and very slow response

I apologize, I typoed the arguments to the last command. Please replace ' riak@10.127.137.185' with the correct hostname in: yz_kv:is_metadata_consistent('riak@10.128.137.185 '). Also, can you confirm these log messages are still being written. Jordan On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 10:54 PM, Chaim So