On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 8:32 AM, Erik Søe Sørensen wrote:
> It really is not a good idea to use siblings to represent 1-to-many
> relations. That's not what it's intended for, nor what it's optimized for...
>
Ok, understood.
> Can you tell us exactly why you need Bitcask rather than LevelDB? 2i
Upon thinking about things a little more, if anyone has information on
how to do time series with counters(current, 5 seconds ago, 10 seconds
ago, and 30 seconds ago), that would be a great thing to have for the
project I'm doing.
Thanks again for the help!
Bryce
On 12/17/13 17:09, Jeremiah
Thank you for the quick response Jeremiah.
I didn't know that inputs could accept a list of buckets. I do believe
that will solve my problem.
I'm currently using MR to grab a list all keys/counters and use the
reduce phase to sort the keys by highest count. Because I'm using
counters the bac
It really is not a good idea to use siblings to represent 1-to-many relations.
That's not what it's intended for, nor what it's optimized for...
Can you tell us exactly why you need Bitcask rather than LevelDB? 2i would
probably do it.
Otherwise, storing a list of items under each key could be a
The allowable inputs to an MR map phase include a list of bucket key pairs.
If you know your keys in advance the problem is solved.
Can you describe a bit more about how you're using MR? Is this an ad hoc
query? A predictable report? Time based?
---
sent from a tiny portion of the hive mind...
in
Hi All,
I have a question concerning map-reduce. I have two buckets with
counters enabled that have similar keys to track two different metrics.
At the moment in order to combine these two datasets together I have to
make 2 different map-reduce queries and combine the data within the
client.
Hey all,
I'm working on testing out some of the CRDT features but haven't been able
to sort through the incantations to store/query any CRDT other than a
counter. any tips?
thanks,
--James
___
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.basho.com
http://
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Viable Nisei wrote:
> Here you can check our code sample (in java) reproducing this behavior:
> https://bitbucket.org/vsnisei/riak-allow_mult_wtf
> ...
> Anyway, looks like that some DoS/DDoS attack approach utilizing this
> behavior may be proposed. We should onl
mainly a spec for the straight http or pb APIs, as far as I understand the
only client with explicit support right now is erlang.
thanks!
--James
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Brian Roach wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> Do you mean via the Erlang client, or one of the other client libs, or ...
> ?
Hi James,
Do you mean via the Erlang client, or one of the other client libs, or ... ?
Thanks,
- Roach
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 12:42 PM, James Moore wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I'm working on testing out some of the CRDT features but haven't been able
> to sort through the incantations to store/query
Hey,
Are you _resolving_ the siblings that you create? It sounds like you’re
purposely creating siblings and not resolving them, as I read things like
‘only 80-100 values per … keys’. Riak is not intended to be used this way.
80 siblings is a lot, and will dramatically decrease performance for tha
Greetings and salutations,
Here is yet another installment of the Riak Recap.
Be sure to keep all of the videos linked below playing while you
online shop for the rest of the people on your holiday gift list. If
you can't figure out what to get someone, just share a link and give
the gift of Riak
Hi.
Recently we've described that something is going unexpectedly. We are using
Riak 1.4.2 with some buckets with allow_mult=true.
We've tried our app under load then found that... concurrently writes into
bucket with allow_mult turning Riak into irresponsible slowpoke and even
crash it.
Core i3
Hi Sean,
To answer your questions -- yeah, the cluster is read heavy, gets:puts ratio
is ~80:1. In the past day, node gets averages 1.4k and node puts averages
20.
--
View this message in context:
http://riak-users.197444.n3.nabble.com/fsm-get-time-increase-on-a-less-busy-system-tp4030107p403
Since you're on 1.4, could you please run "riak-debug" on every node
in your cluster? Please mail me directly and we'll come up with a way
to get them delivered.
Could you please also provide a description of the cluster's typical
workload? Any monitoring graphs or other statistics would be helpfu
Thanks for the reply.
The version is riak 1.4.0. I am looking at node.get.fsm.time.mean and
node.get.fsm.time.median. Both increased.
--
View this message in context:
http://riak-users.197444.n3.nabble.com/fsm-get-time-increase-on-a-less-busy-system-tp4030107p4030112.html
Sent from the Riak
Hello,
Could you provide the Riak version you're using? Which of the get
times are increasing mostly? 95th, 99th, 100th etc?
Thanks.
--
Luke Bakken
CSE
lbak...@basho.com
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 5:44 AM, kzhang wrote:
> we have a 5 node cluster, in the past few days, all the counters indicate a
How heavy is the traffic against the cluster? Is your workload mostly gets?
Which get_fsm stats are growing, is it all of the percentiles or just the
max/100%?
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 7:44 AM, kzhang wrote:
> we have a 5 node cluster, in the past few days, all the counters indicate a
> less bus
Hello Holger,
If you are modifying `cs_root_host` from the default, it must be set
to the fully qualified domain name (FQDN) of your Riak CS endpoint.
More details on this can be found in the Direct subsection of the
Proxy vs. Direct Riak CS documentation. [0]
If that doesn't resolve the issue, p
Hi Georgio,
Can you please provide your app.config files for Riak, Riak CS, and
Stanchion along with log output of the errors you're seeing?
--
Hector
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 7:00 AM, Georgio Pandarez
wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> I've tried a simple benchmark on riak-cs against a 5 node cluster on a
we have a 5 node cluster, in the past few days, all the counters indicate a
less busy system (lower cpu, more available memory, less puts and gets, less
network traffic), however get time increased. I am not sure what's going on.
I checked the logs, nothing jumped to me.
--
View this message i
Hi Guys,
I've tried a simple benchmark on riak-cs against a 5 node cluster on a
100mbit private network with the linux optimisations applied from the site.
At about 200 simultaneous requests per second against a single node
everything is OK, increasing this to 500 I will start seeing 503's back
f
Hi,
i am trying to install riak-cs according to your cookbook but i am now
stuck at the admin user creation. I checked all config files, all ips do
match against each other. All services responding to ping requests. I have
no idea at the moment, maybe someone is able to assist me.
cat /etc/riak-c
23 matches
Mail list logo
