I appreciate the help Kelly! ( And sorry for the double mail you're going
to get, accidentally didn't reply to all. ) I've provided the requested
information below.
app.config:
http://pastebin.centos.org/5716/
app.config for riak-cs is managed by puppet, installing the same file on
both nodes.
r
Andy,
To try to get a better idea of what might be going on it would be helpful to
see what your riak and riak cs app.config files look like. Also the output of
riak-admin ring-status and riak-admin member-status could be useful. For the
upload issue I am curious if you have changed the port th
Hey guys,
I'm working on a dev environment for a riak-cs setup.
2 vms and an external proxy
Config of the riak/riak-cs nodes appears to be all complete. I'm
encountering two issues I'd like some pointers on where to begin diagnosing
before I go around stracing everything.
Firstly:
When using s3
Hi Jeff,
You can modify the location of the data and log files by editing the
appropriate entries in app.config
Changing the location of app.config and vm.args would involve modifying the
lib/env.sh file to change the value of RUNNER_ETC_DIR.
As you said, this may introduce other issues since it
s/metadata/data/ - each sibling is a discrete copy of whatever data you've
put in it + metadata.
In the case of the client side indexes, you're right - the bulk of the
increased storage will be from metadata.
---
Jeremiah Peschka - Founder, Brent Ozar Unlimited
MCITP: SQL Server 2008, MVP
Clouder
Hi,
I just came across the instructions to install Riak again and I think
there's some insecurities with the instructions.
On this page[1], there is a line that suggests we should do this:
curl http://apt.basho.com/gpg/basho.apt.key | sudo apt-key add -
This is not https and should be. Addi
Thanks for the input.
If i understand correctly the only size overhead would be in the extra
metadata added by all the siblings?
2013/11/13 Hector Castro
> The `put_index` snippet in the following blog post actually forces the
> creation of siblings (while `get_index` resolves them by doing a
Hey,
I'm trying to come up with an solution to writing child objects where the
parent will be reference by some secondary index.
The data model contains a list of devices, each with a list of messages
beneath them.
Currently I have a hierarchical scheme where devices are stored under
(devices, )
The `put_index` snippet in the following blog post actually forces the
creation of siblings (while `get_index` resolves them by doing a set
union):
http://basho.com/index-for-fun-and-for-profit/
As John said, you definitely want to be careful not to create too many
siblings because that'll impact
On 13 Nov 2013, at 10:03, Carlos Baquero wrote:
>
> Its interesting to see a use case where a grow only set is sufficient. I
> believe Riak 2.0 will offer optimized OR-Sets that allow item removal at the
> expense of some extra complexity in element storage and logarithmic metadata
> growth
Its interesting to see a use case where a grow only set is sufficient. I
believe Riak 2.0 will offer optimized OR-Sets that allow item removal at the
expense of some extra complexity in element storage and logarithmic metadata
growth per operation. But for your case a simple direct set of eleme
We have introduced these so that users who are accidentally creating siblings
(and large objects) can be notified in their logs.
1) Of course you can choose to change the limits
2) Please Please only do so if you know what you're doing. There's a certain
amount of "you're on your own", because
12 matches
Mail list logo
