I didn't want you to think that you've been forgotten, but I've been
swamped getting ready to head out of the country for 2 weeks on a company
trip. You're in good hands with the list, though.
---
Jeremiah Peschka - Founder, Brent Ozar Unlimited
MCITP: SQL Server 2008, MVP
Cloudera Certified Devel
Not forgotten you Kevin, out of the country at the moment, will get back to
you soon as I can
Regards
Richard
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Kevin Burton wrote:
> Here is the config that I am using:
>
> ** **
>
> {driver,
>
> basho_bench_driver_2i}.
>
> ** **
>
> {operations,
Hi Riak Users,
Here is what I have:
::riak]ulimit -a
core file size (blocks, -c) 0
data seg size (kbytes, -d) unlimited
file size (blocks, -f) unlimited
max locked memory (kbytes, -l) unlimited
max memory size (kbytes, -m) unlimited
open files
I just tried and it worked for me, here's what I see:
➜ riak_kv git:(master) ./rebar --version
rebar 2.0.0 R14B03 20120816_132849 git 1c98f6c
➜ riak_kv git:(master) erl
Erlang R15B01 (erts-5.9.1) [source] [64-bit] [smp:8:8] [async-threads:0]
[kernel-poll:false]
I also tried erlang 14b04 and it
Thanks Christian and BR Rune for your answers, we'll reconsider how we
did our processing since obviously we badly react to tombstones when our
MR query meet them.
Best Regards,
Bernard
Le 28/02/2013 16:17, Christian Dahlqvist a écrit :
Hi Bernard,
The description in the documentation is e
Hello Jonas,
I think the issue is that you actually wiped out too much by removing
the entire /var/lib/riak directory.
Typically when resetting the data directories on a Riak node, you'd remove
the contents of only those backend directories which correspond to the ones
defined in your app.config.
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 5:53 AM, wrote:
> The recommended way to implement efficient multiget is to perform normal
> GET operations in parallel. If you are retrieving 20 objects, you don't
> necessarily need to do all 20 GETs in parallel, but could set it up to use
> perhaps 3 or 4 connections. I
A general comment on Riak's Reduce scalability.
Map scales fine but Reduce doesn't. The single coordinating node does
the final reducing, so latency from reduces will not improve from adding
more nodes. MR jobs where lots of data is sent from map to reduce, will
also get the coordinating node
Yesterday I added a new node to my cluster. During the time when ownership
handoff was happening (several hours of work) mapreduce map functions were
receiving {error, notfound} as inputs. My Erlang mapred functions weren't
designed to handle this. They hadn't encountered this before during normal
Jared,
running make in riak_kv dies [0] for me :-/
Best
Sebastian
[0]: https://gist.github.com/tisba/5057828
On 22.02.2013, at 19:56, Jared Morrow wrote:
> compile riak_kv with just 'make'
___
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.basho.com
h
Hey Pavel,
Sorry to hear you're running into trouble. Here's a couple of things that will
help us help you out:
Can you provide some more info, or code used to load Riak and Redis? What
version of the Python client are you using? Have you tried retrieving the
missing keys with another client,
Hi Bernard,
The description in the documentation is entirely accurate and not at all purely
theoretical. Riak will automatically select a covering set of vnodes/partitions
that hold the data set required to complete the job. All physical nodes may
therefore net need to participate in the job. W
Hi Christian,
At
http://docs.basho.com/riak/1.3.0/references/appendices/MapReduce-Implementation/
, one can read "...any Riak node can also coordinate a MapReduce query
by sending a map-step evaluation request directly to the node
responsible for maintaining the input data. Map-step results a
Hi Boris,
Apart from not scaling quite as well as straight K/V access, emulating multiGET
through MapReduce also has another significant drawback. MapReduce has no
concept of quorum reads, and only work on a single copy of the data, which can
be thought of basically as a read with R=1 that does
I realize now that read_block_error, <<"0">> means that there was not an
error...
I still get problems when running my integration tests:
{insufficient_vnodes,0,need,2}
status code 0
Could it be a timing issue where I start my integration tests too early
after 'riak start'?
On 28 February 2013
15 matches
Mail list logo