Hi Ariel,
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 7:35 PM, Ariel Valentin wrote:
> Thanks for the reply.
>
> I recently learned about carrierwave, which does not have a dependency on
> activerecord. I think am going to give that a try. I don't like the idea of
> having embedded documents in this case but rather
We now believe this to be fixed in the following commit to rjc. Socket
timeouts were not resulting in permits being released -
https://github.com/basho/riak-java-client/commit/b8a4e7b872ae26e2c38e0ff4dd3e2d617a2c8344
The content of the byte[]s indicated that multiple threads were
reading from the
Hey riak-users,
Today we released the Ruby Riak Client (riak-client gem), version
1.1.1. The only change from version 1.1.0 was a fix for older
patchlevels of Ruby 1.8.7 (before p315) that had a bug in Net::HTTP.
We encountered this bug when testing the upcoming Riak 1.3 release on
Ubuntu 10.04LTS
Thanks Andrew -- that works.
The reason I was doing stuff on the console is that this didn't work in my
running application either.
lager:log(info, self(), "foo ~s", [bar]) also works fine in my app code. But
the other commands do not. Which makes me think that since:
> Lager doesn't actually
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 01:11:18PM -0500, John Kemp wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't usually have issues with lager, but in logging for my application, I
> feel like I've done all the right things:
>
> i) Put lager_transform in my rebar config:
>
> {erl_opts, [debug_info, warnings_as_errors, {parse_tra
Hi,
I don't usually have issues with lager, but in logging for my application, I
feel like I've done all the right things:
i) Put lager_transform in my rebar config:
{erl_opts, [debug_info, warnings_as_errors, {parse_transform,
lager_transform}]}.
ii) Lager is started when my app starts, and
All nodes, but one at a time. It seems to be whichever one is servicing the
request.
On Jan 10, 2013, at 9:57 AM, Evan Vigil-McClanahan
wrote:
> Does this happen on all of the nodes, or just one? One client, or all
> of them? A particular type of request, or just at random?
>
> On Thu, Jan
Does this happen on all of the nodes, or just one? One client, or all
of them? A particular type of request, or just at random?
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 1:29 AM, Brad Heller wrote:
> I'm using regular ol' ruby-riak client to write to the bucket. It's all
> pretty much out of the box. There is a
Hi Shaan,
When using a bucket, input is <<"groceries">>. Did you by any chance specify it
as [<<"groceries">>]?
I ran the example and it worked for me with the following result:
28> {ok, [{1, [R]}]} = riakc_pb_socket:mapred(Client,<<"groceries">>,[{map,
{qfun, Count}, none, false},{reduce, {qf
Hi Shaan,
The riakc_pb_socket:mapred function can take several different types of input:
a bucket name, a list of bucket/key pairs or a secondary index query
specification.
If you wanted to run the example in the tutorial based on all keys in the
groceries bucket instead of having to specify
Shaan,
While you may be able to specify the entire bucket as input, map
functions only operate on a single input object. If you want to
operate across the entire set, use reduce. (Note that in order to
fetch the objects, you will need a map phase, even if it just returns
its input.)
On Thu, Jan 1
Hi Matt,
For stopping and starting rather than rebooting, you need to use
elastic IPs inside of Amazon's virtual private cloud[1] which allows
for persistent static private addresses.
[1]http://aws.amazon.com/vpc/
Regards
Richard
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 6:09 AM, Matt Black wrote:
> A quick up
I'm using regular ol' ruby-riak client to write to the bucket. It's all pretty
much out of the box. There is an ELB in front of the ring with SSL on the ELB
and on passed through to the ring, if that's significant.
Nothing special that I can identify. I can attempt to instrument our code
furthe
13 matches
Mail list logo
