Thanks for the reply.
I recently learned about carrierwave, which does not have a dependency on
activerecord. I think am going to give that a try. I don't like the idea of
having embedded documents in this case but rather a reference to a value in a
separate bucket.
I will RTFM when I get a
Hi Ariel,
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 7:23 PM, Ariel Valentin wrote:
> Does Ripple provide file attachement functionality similar to paperclip or
> attachement_fu?
>
> I'd like to be able to attach binary data to a Ripple Document object that
> is being stored in a different bucket.
>
It looks like
The client is thread-safe. You can create an instance of it, pass it
to multiple threads, and perform multiple store operations in
parallel.
Thanks,
- Roach
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 12:46 PM, catchme wrote:
> Could you provide an example of using Multi-threading on the client?
>
>
>
> --
> View th
I've had a few situations arise where one or two nodes (all it needs is
one node) will begin a heavy compaction cycle (determined by using gstat
+ looking at leveldb LOG files) and ALL queries put through the cluster
(it doesn't matter which node) return a timeout.
I can fix this situation by kill
I'm not sure how much this will help, but I will throw my two cents into
the hat. Given that I don't know the details of your requirements, and I
am fairly new to riak and aws, please take everything with a grain of salt.
On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Deepak Balasubramanyam <
deepak.b...@gmail
Hi,
i do have a reduce phase
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 12:08 AM, Mridul Kashatria wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If I am correct, adding a reduce function should return the same number of
> items.
>
> I'm a riak noob but I faced some similar issue while testing with a map
> function only. Adding a reduce fixed
Hi Matt,
Just to add to Charlie's suggestion, you could take a look at EC2 elastic IP
addresses which would allow you to permanently map a public and private address
to an EC2 instance, assignDNS hostnames and not have them change on reboot[1]
[1] http://aws.amazon.com/articles/1346
Regards
R
Matt:
You would need to use (or implement your own) DNS service that you could
programmatically access--Route 53 has an API that you could use to create DNS
entries that point to the internal addresses of your nodes. In very carefully
re-reading the thread Deepak mentions, one problem that wi
We're seeing instances of a JVM app which talks to riak run out of
memory when riak operations rise in latency or riak becomes otherwise
unresponsive. A heap dump of the JVM at the time of the OOM show that
91% of the 1G (active) heap is consumed by large byte[] instances. In
our case 3 of those by
Thanks for this Charlie.
I'm running a production Riak cluster on AWS which runs constantly, and
I've been wondering how I might be able to easliy stop and start AWS nodes
for a testing and benchmarking cluster (to save on cost).
By using the 'riaknode1.priv' hostname method you describe, would I
Could you provide an example of using Multi-threading on the client?
--
View this message in context:
http://riak-users.197444.n3.nabble.com/store-performance-tp4026462p4026488.html
Sent from the Riak Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
ria
Hi Vijay,
I would recommend performing your own benchmarks over taking stock in
others'.
There is a benchmarking utility called basho_bench[0] that you could use to
benchmark Bitcask and configure[1] it to your own specifications.
[0] https://github.com/basho/basho_bench
[1] http://docs.basho.co
Hi All,
Anyone of you have did the benchmark testing on riak with bitcask as
backend ? If yes then can you guys share those information with me.
--
Thanks and Regards,
Vijay Gupta ( ??)
Engineering Group.
Hostway Corporation
NOTICE: This email and any file transmitted are confidential
Hi,
If I am correct, adding a reduce function should return the same number
of items.
I'm a riak noob but I faced some similar issue while testing with a map
function only. Adding a reduce fixed it.
I believe as the map fans out to multiple nodes, whichever node returns
data first is writt
Kaspar,
When a Riak write "fails" the value can still have been written.
Failure is really just a notification that the write didn't complete as
requested, usually because one or more of the cluster writes failed.
And being written, even just to a single node, that singly written value can
lat
Deepak:
When you name a node in app.config with -name it has to have a '.' in it, like
r...@hostname.net As you have surmised, you can get around that if you use the
-sname argument instead.
They have to be done consistently. In your example, had you used the -sname
argument, `riak@riaknod
Justin Sheehy wrote
> Yes, I confirmed this earlier in this thread:
>
> http://lists.basho.com/pipermail/riak-users_lists.basho.com/2013-January/010672.html
>
> -Justin
Sorry for the double-post, that was not intended. What about setting
DW=DR=2? In this case only at most one partition can succe
17 matches
Mail list logo
