Hello,
I am just starting out with Riak and want to use Pre-Commit Hooks to
automatically add links to keys in a different bucket. To give a
simple example, when I add '/bucket2/object2' I want to add a link to
the object in '/bucket1/object1' that points to the new object. I
would like to do this
The issue is that some nodes will be faster than others and then you'll be
pissed off that you can't get your SSDs installed fast enough.
---
Jeremiah Peschka - Managing Director, Brent Ozar PLF, LLC
Microsoft SQL Server MVP
On Mar 7, 2012, at 1:02 PM, Chad DePue wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> we just ha
Riak Users,
We are pleased to announce the availability of the final release of Riak 1.1.1.
This is a bug fix release of the Riak 1.1 codebase. If you are using
MapReduce on 1.1.0, we highly recommend you upgrade to 1.1.1 to get the various
M/R related bug fixes.
The full list of changes can
Hi all,
we just had a client ask for SSD drives - we're wondering if there are
issues mixing riak nodes for a while - 3 nodes w/regular drives, 1 w/SSD -
the 1 w/SSD will be significantly faster I have no doubt - has anyone had
issues with doing this? I don't want to migrate all nodes at once for
Having the keys prefixed with the seconds since epoch solved the problem.
Thanks,
Marco
On 6 March 2012 15:47, Marco Monteiro wrote:
> It makes sense, David. I'm going to give it a try.
> Hopefully this will make it usable for the next month
> until the issue is addressed.
>
> I'll let you know
Thanks, Jeff:
I really appreciate your answer. The second option (separate buckets) looks
more effective for my pet project as I hope each post will have a lot of
comments.
Thanks again,
-- Buriwoy
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 10:41 AM, Jeff Kirkell wrote:
> Buriwoy,
>
> I apologize in advance as I t
Buriwoy,
I apologize in advance as I tend to write daily long replies. You have a
couple options and I can provide some of the insight I have learned up till
now but confusing answer is you can do both of what you wrote.
You can have a bucket which is just called posts that also contains the
comm
I have another crazy idea :) What if I create a bucket for each blog's
comments? So, riak/blog_bucket/blog_01 and comments go to
riak/blog_01_comments?
Any ideas?
-- Buriwoy
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Buri Arslon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm very new to NoSQL/KV database systems. Sean's webinar "
Jacques -
Older client -> newer Riak shouldn't pose any issues.
Newer client -> older Riak should also be fine with the caveat that any
attempts to use features that are not present in the older version of Riak will
of course fail.
Thanks,
Brian Roach
On Mar 1, 2012, at 10:17 AM, Jacques
Mihai,
thanks for the advice, I really like your suggestion. Do you have any data
regarding the performance trade off you are making by using the erlang
protobuf api instead of riak:local_client?
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Mihai Balea wrote:
> Adam,
>
> We are also using local_client to r
10 matches
Mail list logo