On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 08:38:15PM -0500, Jeremy Raymond wrote:
> So if I do have a bucket that I regularly want a listing of the keys for (or
> really that I want to access all of the objects) what is the recommend
> procedure? Put the same 2i index on each object in the bucket and then do an
> in
So if I do have a bucket that I regularly want a listing of the keys for (or
really that I want to access all of the objects) what is the recommend
procedure? Put the same 2i index on each object in the bucket and then do an
index query on it? Is doing a mapred operation specifying a bucket as the
I am putting in 2i right now.
Obvious first thoughts:
1) Why is there a "bucket" as well as index->value? Why are indexes
not "global?" Since getting all keys for a bucket requires a keyspace
walk, why do we need to pass a bucket parameter?What is the
relationship here?
2) No ordering of
I haven't had a chance to track down all the logs, ring state, etc and
reproduce this issue, but I've updated my deploy script to just reload the
mapped module while Riak is running rather than bouncing the nodes.
I did however recently upgrade from Riak 1.0.0 to 1.0.2 and saw the same 3rd
node
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 10:50 AM, Greg Pascale wrote:
> I think your logic is flawed. Each node has fewer *keys to return*, but
> that doesn't mean it has that much less work. Whether you're returning 1
> key or 100, you still have to go to disk to read from the index, and I have
> to imagine that
Hello
I have couple of question regarding the last modified information fetching form
Riak PB client
1. The last modified is split into to two parts lastModified and
lastModifiedUsec. How to combine these to make atypical EPOCH time. As the per
the PB java code the calculation seems like
> That's a concern, but you gain parallelism, compared to Search's single term
> index.
>
>
>
> While they are more expensive in the sense that they require more nodes to
> participate, they split the load between the nodes, thus overall, the work
> should be about the same, and unless the n
It's worth noting that you can use an objects primary key as the source for
a 2i query. This is helpful if you want a known range of keys in a bucket.
http://wiki.basho.com/Secondary-Indexes.html#Special-Fields
Reid
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Andrew Thompson wrote:
> I think if you disabl
I think if you disable legacy keylisting, we'll just break a limb now.
Seriously though, keylists are at least non-blocking in 1.0, so the
vnodes aren't prevented from doing any reads/writes while the keylist is
running. However, remember that a keylist of any kind that isn't on a
single vnode (th
I didn't see anyone address this. Did I miss it, or is this just a wildly
unpopular question?
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ariyeh
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 4:25 PM
To: riak-users@lists.basho.com
Subject: bucket key listing
Ripple indicates that a representative from Basho will c
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Sajithkumar Kizhakkiniyil
wrote:
> If my understanding is correct a reduce phase with
> riak_kv_mapreduce.reduce_identity is needed for secondary index query.
Hi, Sajithkumar. The reduce_identity function is only needed if the
result you want is the list of bucke
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Kresten Krab Thorup
wrote:> Now, it seems that if the items passing
between the map phase and reduce phase are many and small, then the
system could benefit from a "chunking" fitting that collects items and
sends them off in a list to the next fitting, after receiv
Hi Rusty,
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Rusty Klophaus wrote:
> Hi Jeroen,
>
> Your understanding is correct, the search query is parsed into a tree,
> where each leaf of the tree corresponds to a term. Each leaf sends back all
> matching terms, and results are intersected (or unioned) where
FYI I got this reaction from Elias (this is a forward it to the list so it
will be archived correctly. Thank you Elias btw)
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Elias Levy wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 6:01 AM, wrote:
>
>> From: Jeroen van Dijk
>>
>> The use case I'm talking about is when you are
Hi,
Sorry, but I've done a lot of googling and haven't been to work out where
this is going wrong, could someone please point out where I may be going
wrong with it. I have riak search enabled and set to true and riak clusters
all restarted. I go through the following steps below using
riak-erlang
15 matches
Mail list logo
