Re: Riak search installation failure.

2011-09-08 Thread vijayakumar
Hi Jermiah, Linux version 2.6.18-128.el5 (mockbu...@builder10.centos.org) (gcc version 4.1.2 20080704 (Red Hat 4.1.2-44)) is the unix version. I am able to install and start riak successfully however riak-search make fails. Regards, Vijayakumar. On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 7:13 PM, Jeremiah Pesc

Re: Python transports

2011-09-08 Thread Greg Stein
On my 'newhttp' branch, the ConnectionManager class handles all connections to the server(s) for the transports (many connections to many servers). The transport can worry about what goes onto the wire, and the CM worries about the underlying connections. Today, there are multiple transports, each

Re: Riak 1.0 pre-release series

2011-09-08 Thread Greg Stein
No worries. That is what "pre-release" is all about :-) ... I'm focusing on the Python support right now, and 0.14.x works just fine for that, but I'll look into the 1.0-pre in the next week or two. Thanks! -g On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 13:02, Jared Morrow wrote: > Sorry about the lack of a source p

Re: TestServer functionality in Python client

2011-09-08 Thread Duncan McGreggor
Nice!!! d P.S. Hey, Soren :-) On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 4:42 AM, Soren Hansen wrote: > I feel compelled to share a bit of praise: > > The TestServer functionality in the python client is absolutely the > coolest thing since sliced bread. Up until now, I've been using an > abomination of a fakeriak

Re: Python transports

2011-09-08 Thread Brett Hoerner
I own the pull request that adds (very basic) pooling logic to the Riak client. I left Transports alone (each is a single connection) and decided to have pools be another class you pick just like transport. This allows you instantly use any pooling logic (never remove down servers, delete down serv

Re: Riak 1.0 pre-release series

2011-09-08 Thread Jared Morrow
Sorry about the lack of a source package, that was my oversight. I just uploaded one to downloads.basho.com. Thanks for the feedback, -Jared On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 5:52 AM, Greg Stein wrote: > On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 07:47, David Smith wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 5:41 AM, Greg Stein wr

Re: Riak in AWS

2011-09-08 Thread Mark Phillips
Don't forget about the wiki ;) http://wiki.basho.com/Community-Developed-Libraries-and-Projects.html#Recipes%2C-Cookbooks%2C-and-Configurations Mark On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 8:32 AM, Matt Heitzenroder wrote: > It's a bit out of date, and pool party seems to be abandoned, but > https://github.com

Re: Riak Clustering Changes in 1.0

2011-09-08 Thread Joseph Blomstedt
> Out of curiousity, what was the reason for the 'join' command behaviour to > change? 1. Existing bugs/limitations. For example, joining two entire clusters together was not an entirely safe operation. In some cases, the newly formed cluster would not correctly converge, leaving the ring/cluster

Re: Riak in AWS

2011-09-08 Thread Matt Heitzenroder
It's a bit out of date, and pool party seems to be abandoned, but https://github.com/roder/riakaws should get you there quickly. Try also searching http://riak.markmail.com, I'm sure there are a few other scripts too Cheers, Matt On Sep 8, 2011, at 9:54 AM, Jeremiah Peschka wrote: > Cool!

Re: Riak in AWS

2011-09-08 Thread Jeremiah Peschka
Cool! Good to know I have a few options. Thanks. --- Jeremiah Peschka - Founder, Brent Ozar PLF, LLC Microsoft SQL Server MVP On Sep 7, 2011, at 10:20 PM, John E. Vincent wrote: > If you're not uncomfortable with Chef, you can use the riak cookbook > to get things up and going. > > On Wed, Sep 7

Re: Riak search installation failure.

2011-09-08 Thread Jeremiah Peschka
After some quick googlin', this is a sign that you don't have a full development environment installed. You need more things than a compiler to build software - linkers and libraries and other assorted pieces of code. I have no idea how to help you on whichever *nix you're using, though. --- Jer

Re: Riak 1.0 pre-release series

2011-09-08 Thread Jeremiah Peschka
For those wanting source access, you can always clone master and then use the following command to check out the tag for the 1.0 pre 1 source: git co riak-1.0.pre1 -b riak10p1 --- Jeremiah Peschka - Founder, Brent Ozar PLF, LLC Microsoft SQL Server MVP On Sep 8, 2011, at 4:52 AM, Greg Stein wrot

Re: Riak search installation failure.

2011-09-08 Thread Jonathan Langevin
* This doesn't directly answer your issue, but Riak Search is supposed to be getting rolled in to the core of Riak. Last night, the Riak 1.0 Pre-Release package was made available, which has many good new features (and should supposedly have Riak Search already included). As long as you're not inte

Re: Python transports

2011-09-08 Thread Greg Stein
Yup, agreed. I can certainly see use-cases where a client may have particular knowledge about data/server locality, and wants to open connections to *just* those servers. The transports that I am advocating open connections to servers described by one layer higher. That layer could say "all Riak se

Re: Bitcask with sync_strategy o_sync seem to have no effect

2011-09-08 Thread David Smith
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 9:14 PM, Tatsuya Kawano wrote: > Hi David, > > OK, so there is no easy fix on Linux. I think generating the warning > message will help. Thanks for look into this. I would note that it's possible to configure a periodic sync still with bitcask on Linux; it's just going to b

Re: Riak 1.0 pre-release series

2011-09-08 Thread Greg Stein
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 07:47, David Smith wrote: > On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 5:41 AM, Greg Stein wrote: > >> I just checked out the link (provided below) and did not find a >> *source* distribution. Could you work that into the distribution? > > Yes, there should be one of those -- will ping Jared.

Re: Python transports

2011-09-08 Thread Russell Brown
One big yes. Couldn't agree more, and it is the direction the Java client is moving. I think the .net client is either there or on the way too. Ditto for ripple, the ruby client. Makes perfect sense. On 8 Sep 2011, at 12:31, Greg Stein wrote: > Hey, all... > > After a couple comments on my rec

Re: Python transports

2011-09-08 Thread Phil Stanhope
I like the idea of RiakTransport as you describe it. It opens the door to other potential underlying transports and isolating a client from knowledge of those (websockets, tcp, zeromq messaging come to mind). I'm not suggesting that RIAK will ever support these transports by this comment, however.

Re: Riak 1.0 pre-release series

2011-09-08 Thread David Smith
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 5:41 AM, Greg Stein wrote: > I just checked out the link (provided below) and did not find a > *source* distribution. Could you work that into the distribution? Yes, there should be one of those -- will ping Jared. > In my particular situation, I'm working on Mac OS 10.5

TestServer functionality in Python client

2011-09-08 Thread Soren Hansen
I feel compelled to share a bit of praise: The TestServer functionality in the python client is absolutely the coolest thing since sliced bread. Up until now, I've been using an abomination of a fakeriak library that exposed an identical interface to python-riak, but was backed entirely by Python

Re: Riak 1.0 pre-release series

2011-09-08 Thread Greg Stein
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 19:24, David Smith wrote: >... > The first stage is "pre-release" (aka PR) builds that represent the > feature-complete Riak 1.0, with minor cleanup and tweaks still > ongoing. You WILL find some rough edges with packaging and the > features -- we're still working through th

Python transports

2011-09-08 Thread Greg Stein
Hey, all... After a couple comments on my recent work, and some archaeology on the Python/Riak work over the past month... I've realized that I might have a very different view of RiakTransport compared to what I'm seeing in the current work. I figured it best to bring that to the forefront and di

Re: Riak Clustering Changes in 1.0

2011-09-08 Thread Jens Rantil
Out of curiousity, what was the reason for the 'join' command behaviour to change? Regards, Jens --- Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2011 18:12:40 -0600 From: Joseph Blomstedt To: riak-users Users Subject: Riak Clustering Changes in 1.0 Messag

Re: Riak Clustering Changes in 1.0

2011-09-08 Thread Ciprian Dorin Craciun
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 03:12, Joseph Blomstedt wrote: > Given that 1.0 prerelease packages are now available, I wanted to > mention some changes to Riak's clustering capabilities in 1.0. In > particular, there are some subtle semantic differences in the > riak-admin commands. More complete docs wi

Riak search installation failure.

2011-09-08 Thread vijayakumar
I tried to install riak-search as explained in http://wiki.basho.com/Riak-Search---Installation---RHEL-and-CentOS.html, but I ended with up the following error in "make rel" stage. loading cache ./config.cache checking host system type... x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu checking target system type...