Re: Slow performance on search-cmd set-schema

2011-07-12 Thread David Smith
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 7:51 PM, Ken Perkins wrote: > What could be causing the delay on the rackspace VM? Is it purely a VM > performance issue, or is there something else going on. The blessing of the cloud: It hides the Hard Stuff. The curse of the cloud: It hides the Hard Stuff. :) First ord

Re: mr_queue gone wild

2011-07-12 Thread Sylvain Niles
Thanks again for all the pointers. After much digging I found the issue. We have UTF8 validation on the most data we put into riak (our events bucket), but weren't validating UTF8 on some objects that are linked to by many other objects (group bucket). Consequently some malformed UTF8 (that display

Slow performance on search-cmd set-schema

2011-07-12 Thread Ken Perkins
I've got two 5 node riak-search rings. Both of them are using virtualized 2gb Ubuntu 10.04 VMs. One ring is on linode, the other is on rackspace. Both are identical binaries (14.2) When I run search-cmd set-schema on a machine on the linode ring, it returns nearly instantly. When I run the s

Re: Riak in a common test suite

2011-07-12 Thread Scott Gonyea
While not fool-proof, one idea might be to generate a random string for each test-block, and prefix any bucket names with said string. While it depends on what you're doing, I think something like this should work for the bulk of your tests. Scott On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Jared Morrow w

Re: LevelDB driver

2011-07-12 Thread Justin Sheehy
Hi, Phil. I might have caused a little confusion. I mentioned, but perhaps didn't sufficiently emphasize, that the benchmark comparing LevelDB to InnoDB was not a benchmark of Riak at all, but just directly talking to the storage engines in order to look at the feasibility of doing more with Level

Re: Riak in a common test suite

2011-07-12 Thread Jared Morrow
Mikhail, I'll add something to virtualized option. If you start the vm's from a snapshot vm that is already running, but with riak stopped, you could possibly get it started and running in a couple of minutes or less. If that is reasonable for your test suite, that seems like a good option. -

Re: Riak in a common test suite

2011-07-12 Thread Mathias Meyer
Mikhail, that certainly sounds possible, but would extend the run time of your test suite quite considerably, e.g. when you start a fresh set of virtualized instances on every run. An alternative would be to always leave a Riak cluster running for testing purposes and reset it after or before

Riak in a common test suite

2011-07-12 Thread Mikhail Sobolev
Hi, As part of our test suite I'd like to start a three node cluster for the testing purposes. Could anyone [please! :)] comment on feasibility/possibility of such a thing? -- Misha signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ riak-users mailing

Re: LevelDB driver

2011-07-12 Thread Phil Stanhope
Can you share some LevelDB config examples? I've built latest from github and know that I've got the elevedb driver/wrapper. make devrel is producing a {storage_backend, riak_kv_bitcask_backend} ... is it as simple as changing this to riak_kv_eleveldb_backend? Perhaps I missed it ... but did you

Re: LevelDB driver

2011-07-12 Thread David Smith
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Will Moss wrote: > I know you guys are busy working on various new features, is this going to > make it into the next production release? Is there a date for that? Is there > somewhere to look at your road map so I don't have to spam the list? Hi Will, Yes, the

Re: Quering Riaksearch on Second Node

2011-07-12 Thread Mathias Meyer
You don't necessarily have to reindex your data. Copying over the data directories from the old Riak instances should do. Mathias Meyer Developer Advocate, Basho Technologies On Montag, 11. Juli 2011 at 14:58, Muhammad Yousaf wrote: > > Thanks Mathias & Sylvain, > Everything works fine on sec

Re: Introduction question

2011-07-12 Thread Mathias Meyer
Anton, 1.) You can include custom headers stored with Riak objects, using the X-Riak-Meta-. These are specific for every Riak object. 2.) To allow just GET requests you'll be better off putting an HTTP aware filter or reverse proxy in front of your Riak cluster, which explicitly only enables G

Introduction question

2011-07-12 Thread Anton Podviaznikov
Hi, I just started with learning documentation and playing with Riak so I have few questions: 1. Can I set custom HTTP headers for HTTP API? 2. Can I enable e.x. just HTTP GET requests? And general question: e.x. I have list of zip codes and want to expose that data via REST(just for reading).