Re: Riak Recap as a Blog (?)

+1 on blog. Additionally, I agree with Keith about ability to search. While a mailing list is great for being able to converse via email, it seems that quite alot of valuable conversations and tips get "lost" due to how ML discussions are archived (i.e. - the interface). For instance, it would be

Riak Recap for June 3 - 5

Afternoon, Evening, Morning to All - Short Recap for Today: New talk slides, blog posts, Basho at Erlang Factory, and more. Enjoy - Mark Community Manager Basho Technologies wiki.basho.com twitter.com/pharkmillups Riak Recap for June 3 - 5 =

Re: riak_search moving forward

Hi Dave, First of all I think it is a great idea to combine riak and riak_search! We are not using the java-based analyzers and so would have no problem with them being omitted from riak_search. Regards, --gordon On Jun 6, 2011, at 17:33 , David Smith wrote: > Hi all, > > One of the things

riak_search moving forward

Hi all, One of the things we've got cooking at Basho HQ is a plan to roll the functionality currently in the riak_search project into the default Riak distribution. This means that using riak_search will become a matter of flipping a configuration switch versus running a whole separate instance. T

Fixed! Was, Re: Question: Object Not Saved After Save/Delete/Save

Jared - Thanks! I ran 'make rel', and got several errors like this: fatal: Not a git repository (or any of the parent directories): .git The entire output is at https://gist.github.com/1011164. !!! However, the good news is that the build apparently succeeded, and the bug I reported before is

Re: Question: Object Not Saved After Save/Delete/Save

Keith, You can build for OSX using the source tarball for 0.14.2. There are plans in the future to create packages for OSX once again. It is currently planned for our next major release. -Jared On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 10:19 AM, Kei

Re: Logical operators in Ripple

Thanks Jeremiah. Nesting the "and" in another array worked great. On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 1:58 PM, David Mitchell wrote: > The "and" based key filter is not working for me either. See: > http://lists.basho.com/pipermail/riak-users_lists.basho.com/2011-June/004432.html > > > > David > > > > _

Re: Question: Object Not Saved After Save/Delete/Save

Sean and All - In case it helps, the problem manifested on riak 0.14.0 on Mac OS but not on an Ubuntu VM. The most recent version available for download at http://downloads.basho.com/riak/CURRENT/ for Mac OS was 0.14.0, so that's what I'm using. I realize that would have been helpful informat

Re: entry with blank key

You should be able to delete that with the Erlang client. {ok, C} = riak:local_client(), C:delete(<<"110605172211401242">>, <<>>). Sean Cribbs Developer Advocate Basho Technologies, Inc. http://basho.com/ On Jun 6, 2011, at 5:57 PM, Jon Brisbin wrote: > > I accidentally created an entry with

entry with blank key

I accidentally created an entry with a key of "" (blank) with the PB client. Oddly enough, it let me do it and I see it in the list of keys: "keys":["110605172211401242",""] But I can't delete it now. Is there a way to delete this entry (besides deleting the bitcask directory)? Thanks!

Re: riaksearch memory growth issues

Good Morning Gilbert, I have posted this gist: https://gist.github.com/1010384 It is a minor update we made to it_op_collector_loop/3 in riak_search_op_utils. This update was done to alleviate the situation that we observe here: https://gist.github.com/100073

Re: Riak Recap as a Blog (?)

+1 and I love the idea of a RSS feed also. On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 11:51 PM, Mark Phillips wrote: > Hey All - > > Quick question: how would you feel if we turned the Riak Recap into a blog? > > I've spoken with various people in various channels about how to best > deliver the Recap, and while it

Re: Riak Recap as a Blog (?)

On 6/6/2011 9:32 AM, Keith Bennett wrote: Mark - I think that's a great idea. I'd go even further, and suggest that the valuable information discussed on the mailing list be managed in a searchable form, as is the case with Google or Yahoo Groups. (Is it searchable now? I couldn't see how

Re: luwak not properly overwriting data

Francisco, Ryan's patch is in the "Ready" queue for review -- it should be present in the next release. Thanks, D. On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 2:19 PM, francisco treacy wrote: > Hi folks, > > Has Ryan's branch been already merged in? > > Thanks, > Francisco > > 2011/3/20 Ryan Zezeski : >> Francisc

Re: Riak Recap as a Blog (?)

Mark - I think that's a great idea. I'd go even further, and suggest that the valuable information discussed on the mailing list be managed in a searchable form, as is the case with Google or Yahoo Groups. (Is it searchable now? I couldn't see how to search the entire archive for a keyword.)

RE: Key-Filters with logical AND operation and with tokenize

Jeremiah, Thank you for your response. As you have suggested, it does work with: [["and", [["ends_with", "0603"]], [["starts_with", "basho" I have confirmed that the following does work. { "inputs" : { "bucket" : "zips",

Re: Key-Filters with logical AND operation and with tokenize

It does work, but the and/or/not examples in the wiki only show the filter operation that would be passed in to the filters parameter, not the entire contents. The wiki's ["and", [["ends_with", "0603"]], [["starts_with", "basho"]]] should really be [["and", [["ends_with", "0603"]], [["starts_wit

Re: Logical operators in Ripple

The "and" based key filter is not working for me either. See: http://lists.basho.com/pipermail/riak-users_lists.basho.com/2011-June/004432.html David ___ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-u

RE: Key-Filters with logical AND operation and with tokenize

Can someone confirm that the logical AND operation used with tokenize does not work? According to the website (http://wiki.basho.com/Key-Filters.html), it should work, but it does not work for me. David From: David Mitchell Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2011 6:41 PM To: 'riak-users@lists.basho.com

Re: Riak Recap as a Blog (?)

Your ideas intrigue me and I would like to subscribe to your Atom feed. --- Jeremiah Peschka Founder, Brent Ozar PLF On Sunday, June 5, 2011 at 11:51 PM, Mark Phillips wrote: > Hey All - > > Quick question: how would you feel if we turned the Riak Recap into a blog? > > I've spoken with vari

Re: Logical operators in Ripple

Ah, yes, how right you are. I was clearly misremembering my earlier thread about key filter syntax and/or mouthwash consumption... I ran this through the FilterBuilder and got the following for the filter: [[:and, [[:tokenize, "-", 1], [:ends_with, "123" Which caused me to remember that an

Re: Riak Recap as a Blog (?)

+1 here Roman Sent from my iPad On Jun 6, 2011, at 2:51 PM, Mark Phillips wrote: > Hey All - > > Quick question: how would you feel if we turned the Riak Recap into a blog? > > I've spoken with various people in various channels about how to best > deliver the Recap, and while it's clear tha

Riak Recap as a Blog (?)

Hey All - Quick question: how would you feel if we turned the Riak Recap into a blog? I've spoken with various people in various channels about how to best deliver the Recap, and while it's clear that it's a valuable tool for the community, I'm not sure the Mailing List is still the best vehicle