Can I set the backend on a bucket via the PB client now?
http://lists.basho.com/pipermail/riak-users_lists.basho.com/2011-January/002966.html
Thanks!
Jon Brisbin
http://jbrisbin.com
Twitter: @j_brisbin
___
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.ba
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 9, 2011, at 9:35 AM, Mike Oxford wrote:
> So you have Google protocol buffers wrapped in a TLV-type (LTV?) format.
>
> Good to know, thanks for the clarification!
>
> For anyone writing a basic client:
> http://code.google.com/apis/protocolbuffers/docs/cpptutoria
Yes, that's correct (LTV). The wiki page should explain this fairly well.
Sean Cribbs
Developer Advocate
Basho Technologies, Inc.
http://basho.com/
On Apr 9, 2011, at 12:35 PM, Mike Oxford wrote:
> So you have Google protocol buffers wrapped in a TLV-type (LTV?) format.
>
> Good to know, thank
So you have Google protocol buffers wrapped in a TLV-type (LTV?) format.
Good to know, thanks for the clarification!
For anyone writing a basic client:
http://code.google.com/apis/protocolbuffers/docs/cpptutorial.html
Substitute with iostreams fed from the network and there you go.
-mox
On Sa
Thanks - are there more details about how that should work or examples anywhere?
On 4/9/11 11:14 AM, Sean Cribbs wrote:
Assuming you encode your data properly and choose buckets/keys that are
URL-safe, there's no reason you can't access it from both interfaces.
Sean Cribbs
Developer Advocate
Assuming you encode your data properly and choose buckets/keys that are
URL-safe, there's no reason you can't access it from both interfaces.
Sean Cribbs
Developer Advocate
Basho Technologies, Inc.
http://basho.com/
On Apr 9, 2011, at 12:10 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 4/9/11 10:47 AM, Sean Cr
On 4/9/11 10:47 AM, Sean Cribbs wrote:
Because it's being confused in this conversation, I think it merits
clarification -- the "protocol" that is used to talk to Riak and Google's
Protocol Buffers are NOT the same thing. Riak uses a simple length- and
message-code-prefixed binary protocol, in w
I didn't permanently abandon it, but it was much more fiddly than doing the
same thing in pure Ruby. I have plans to deliver separate "native" Protocol
Buffers libraries for MRI and JRuby (at least) in 1.0 of the Ruby client.
Because it's being confused in this conversation, I think it merits
The other bug I found has already been filed under bug # 1003.
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 12:14 AM, Rexxe wrote:
> Cool, thanks, I may have found another one.
>
> On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 11:48 PM, Russell Brown wrote:
>
>>
>> On 9 Apr 2011, at 08:22, Rexxe wrote:
>>
>> > I found a bug in Riak, where
Cool, thanks, I may have found another one.
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 11:48 PM, Russell Brown wrote:
>
> On 9 Apr 2011, at 08:22, Rexxe wrote:
>
> > I found a bug in Riak, where do I file it?
>
> https://issues.basho.com
>
> >
> > The bug is that if you use the tokenize key filter and pass in an ind
10 matches
Mail list logo