Hello, can anyone tell me is there any alternative to Luwak to store
large files.??? I want some open source solution alternative to Luwak
which splits the large files in small chunks and then stores the file in
Riak database. I would also like to store metadata of the file in the
Riak.. Please
On 2/18/11 6:34 PM, Ryan Zezeski wrote:
I realized what I just said is confusing. I start out saying there is no N/W/R
in Luwak and end by saying essentially the opposite. Maybe I shouldn't reply on
my iPhone while drinking a beer on my front stoop? Such a nice night in
Baltimore.
Luwak has
I'm experimenting with Riak Search; I'm storing tweets and then trying
to query them. My code to store a tweet is:
tweet = bucket.new(str(uuid.uuid1()), data={
'name': s.user.name,
'text': s.text,
I realized what I just said is confusing. I start out saying there is no
N/W/R in Luwak and end by saying essentially the opposite. Maybe I
shouldn't reply on my iPhone while drinking a beer on my front stoop? Such
a nice night in Baltimore.
Luwak has no _direct_ notion of N/W/R. You can't cal
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Ryan Zezeski wrote:
> Aditya,
>
> Do a search for Luwak on github. It has a decent summary on the main page.
>
https://github.com/basho/luwak (I believe this is what Ryan would have
sent along had he not been responding from his iphone...)
Mark
___
Aditya,
Do a search for Luwak on github. It has a decent summary on the main page.
-Ryan
[Sent from my iPhone]
On Feb 18, 2011, at 4:43 PM, Aditya Patadia wrote:
> Please give me a link from which i can find full luwak documentation. I want
> to see the metadata of a file stored in Luwak bu
Hi Aditya,
There are no concepts of N, W, or R in Luwak. This is because Luwak is built
_on top_ of Riak. To be more specific, Luwak takes a large file and chunks it
into smaller pieces. These smaller pieces are then hashed, and stored under a
key equal to the hash value. That is, Luwak use
Evening, Morning, Afternoon to All,
Here's a tidy Recap to send you into the weekend.
(Quick note: Monday is a holiday in the U.S., so I won't be writing a
Recap. If someone wants to step up and write it in my absence that
would be great. If not, regularly scheduled Recaps will pick back up
on We
We use the java client, mostly in groovy. In terms of wish list
1: Protocol buffer support, this is addressed in the 0.14 version.
2: make the httpconnection max client setting work. I couldn't get this to work
no matter what I do. It always only open 1 connection.
3: support no-data flag. I not
Please give me a link from which i can find full luwak documentation. I
want to see the metadata of a file stored in Luwak but could not find
any way to retrieve it..
https://wiki.basho.com/Luwak.html this link does not provide details in
depth. Please guide me... I want to use it as a redundant
How can I set the number of replica for the Luwak ?? I want to store
atleast 4 replica of my files uploaded to luwak. One more thing.. how to
set 'r' value and 'w' value for the luwak??
___
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.basho.com
http://lis
My mistake - my query format was wrong, [40 TO 100] works fine. Except
run() returns a bunch of lists. Each list contains the bucket name and
the timestamp. More reading required.
Thanks
Mike
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Mike Stoddart wrote:
> My documents are structured like this:
>
> {
>
My documents are structured like this:
{
timestamp: '2011-02-02 08:00:00',
count: 40,
data {
}
}
I want to query all documents where count > 40 so in Python I did:
search_query = client.search('bucket', 'count:[40:*]')
search_query.run()
I got a
Thanks Francisco.
Based on this hint, I succeeded in cleaning out a bucket by rewriting
a dummy value (thus forcing reindexing) and then doing the remove.
Moral of the story: install search hooks first.
-- GWF
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 8:37 AM, francisco treacy
wrote:
> https://issues.basho.com
https://issues.basho.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970
Francisco
2011/2/18 Gary William Flake :
> I just ran a script on a my dev machine to remove everything in the
> local riaksearch instance. In the process, I found something very
> strange. Specifically, there exists objects in my instance that
> can
I just ran a script on a my dev machine to remove everything in the
local riaksearch instance. In the process, I found something very
strange. Specifically, there exists objects in my instance that
cannot be deleted (I get an error whenever I try) and that always
appear with their data intact.
H
No worries - I fully understand and appreciate it all the same. :)
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 10:24 AM, David Smith wrote:
> I should note that we've not had a chance to validate these fedora
> packages to the degree I'd like -- this was simply an
> early-morning-coffee-sipping-I'm-gonna-try-and-bui
I should note that we've not had a chance to validate these fedora
packages to the degree I'd like -- this was simply an
early-morning-coffee-sipping-I'm-gonna-try-and-build-packages
approach. :) When 0.14.1 lands, we should have sorted out these
issues.
Thanks,
D.
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 8:22 A
Riak Search initially complained that the riakuser didn't exist so I created
it. There's no riak user either so I'll create and check the config.
Thanks
Mike
-- Sent from my Palm Pre
On 18 Feb 2011 9:43 a.m., Sean Cribbs wrote:
The "eaccess" error comes from either lacking f
The "eaccess" error comes from either lacking file permissions or the proper
directory structure. In this case, it looks like bitcask could not access the
data directory. Make sure those directories exist and belong to the "riak"
user (there's no "riaksearch" user).
Sean Cribbs
Developer Advo
I installed the new FC13 Riak Search 64bit RPM (onto FC12) but I'm
having issues. I uninstalled Riak and deleted the old database files.
I had to manually create the riaksearch user/group as well as the
/var/lib/riaksearch/bitcask and /var/lib/riaksearch/ring directories.
=INFO REPORT 18-Feb-2
Much better - using simplejson and return_body=False reduces CPU usage
to 0.5-0.7%. Which is more consistent with other DBs.
Thanks for your help!
Mike
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 8:09 AM, Mike Stoddart wrote:
> I added some code to my system to test writing data into Riak. I'm
> using the Python cl
I've uploaded FC13 i686 and x86_64 rpms of riak_search. Please note
that the original upload was incomplete, so you'll need to regrab it.
For completeness, here are the MD5s:
66cf44335d16d15904f0e5551e9d9f36 riak-search-0.14.0-1.fc13.i686.rpm
5e8d8a084d82eb79435cc29ff48a82fe riak-search-0.14.0-1
Great thanks! Any chance you could put up a 64 bit riak search for
FC12/13 as well please? Sorry to be a nuisance!
Thanks
Mike
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 4:15 PM, David Smith wrote:
> http://downloads.basho.com/riak-search/CURRENT/riak-search-0.14.0-1.fc13.i686.rpm
>
> FWIW, we will have Fedora 32/
Hi Alexander!
Thank you for your answer! But the reason I wrote questions was I
have already read the documentation and still have not found the
answer. That is why I send my mail yesterday. I want to find clear
explanation and examples. Has nobody asked similar questions before
me? If you know
25 matches
Mail list logo