Evening, Morning, Afternoon to All,
For today's Recap: An in-memory test backend for riak-js, Riak in
German, some code for the Riak Play Module, Andy Gross talking Dynamo
and Riak, the beginnings of a Small Talk client, and more.
Enjoy,
Mark
Community Manager
Basho Technologies
wiki.basho.com
I've pulled in your changes. Thank you for the revised pull request.
Thanks,
Dan
Daniel Reverri
Developer Advocate
Basho Technologies, Inc.
d...@basho.com
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Anthony Molinaro <
antho...@alumni.caltech.edu> wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> I just managed to get a proper pull
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 04:30:58PM -0700, David Smith wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 03:57:45PM -0800, Anthony Molinaro wrote:
>
> >> some minor iolist functions). The mainline has had some very nice recent
> >> features, the handrolled parser was replaced with a leex/yecc one, and
> >> supp
> On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 03:57:45PM -0800, Anthony Molinaro wrote:
>> some minor iolist functions). The mainline has had some very nice recent
>> features, the handrolled parser was replaced with a leex/yecc one, and
>> support has been added for many protobuff features (like booleans, enums,
>>
Hi Dan,
I just managed to get a proper pull request sent to you for just the
documentation changes. Hopefully it works for you.
I also hope you guys consider joining back with the community of developers
working on erlang_protobuffs so riak can be used along side other protobuff
based systems
Next week we'll be deploying a beta commercial app that uses Riak. We're making
some choices regarding cloud providers and I wanted to get some feedback and
observations from the community regarding use of Riak on virtualized clusters
in general. Info specific to providers might be best to send
That is correct -- that is, you can choose what chash_keyfun to use.
Hashing the key to the vnode is separate from the backend storage, so you can
still store the same key in different buckets.
Sean Cribbs
Developer Advocate
Basho Technologies, Inc.
http://basho.com/
On Jan 10, 2011, at 12:07
To clear up this confusion, let me spell it out. The hash value of any
bucket/key pair is the SHA1 of the serialized tuple of {Bucket, Key}. That is,
{Bucket, Key} -> term_to_binary -> sha1.
The actual function that does the hashing:
https://github.com/basho/riak_core/blob/master/src/chash.erl#
Not necessarily. The hash function hashes the bucket and key.
@siculars on twitter
http://siculars.posterous.com
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 10, 2011, at 3:42, 吴磊 wrote:
Hi, guys
I'm a newbie to Riak, I have the question. Will the objects, which in
different buckets but have the same key,
I believe that keys hare hashed using a combination of bucket name and key
name. The bucket+key string is then run through SHA1. Don't take that as
gospel, though. I searched my mailing list archive and couldn't find it, but
this also could have happened on the IRC channel. Hopefully someone who
kn
Hi, guys
I'm a newbie to Riak, I have the question. Will the objects, which in
different buckets but have the same key, be stored in the same vnode
and be managed by this vnode?
Best regards,
___
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.basho.com
http
11 matches
Mail list logo
