I think I understand your suggestion regarding an additional index in
other buckets.
To use your "keys per time slice" example, if I wanted to get all of
last month's phone call records, I will have already built up a
bucket-key pair that contains a list of keys...
GET /riak/callreport/2010_03
[
I would go with A. An advantage of your data is that it is immutable.
Since it never changes you can do extensive m/r pre computations and
have them run continuously on some frequency. I would also probably
spend some time thinking about the new pre/post hook features to
potentially build s
I am looking to use Riak as a data store for events in our system.
Namely, I have a handful of event types now and anticipate much more
later.
Consider the following "event":
{
"type" : "bws.stats",
"host" : "10.1.55.101",
"description" : "human friendly description",
"details" : "str
I am looking to use Riak as a data store for events in our system.
Namely, I have a handful of event types now and anticipate much more
later.
Consider the following "event":
{
"type" : "bws.stats",
"host" : "10.1.55.101",
"description" : "human friendly description",
"details" : "string
Thanks Jon! That was exactly my problem... Quick note on your
example, msgLen should be msgLen-1 because you already read the
msgCode byte which is included in the msgLen...
--Matthew
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 17:46, Jon Meredith wrote:
> Hi Matthew,
>
> When you read the serverInfoResp you n
Hi Matthew,
When you read the serverInfoResp you need to read the header to find the
length of the response message. The header is 5-bytes - 4-bytes of
length and 1-byte of message code. You should just use the parseFrom
calls - not the parseFromDelimited ones.
Please excuse my java - I have
Hi,
I’m having issues using the protobuf stuff. Writing/reading bytes
directly to/from the socket works but using the protoc generated Java
message builders either gives me nothing useful back or throws invalid
protocol exceptions. I’ve never used the protobuf stuff before so
maybe I’m doing som
Hey All -
We just tagged Riak 0.10rc1, which is the first release candidate for
the 0.10 official release that should be out later this week.
If you're feeling daring, we would encourage you to try it out. Be
sure to let us know if any bugs pop up.
You can get the tarball here:
http://downloads
Hi, Richard.
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Richard Bucker wrote:
> I read an article(from someone at basho) that said that WebMachine was going
> to be more public or something like that. In the meantime it has been forked
> several times and yet projects like riak integrate it. Other branch
I read an article(from someone at basho) that said that WebMachine was going
to be more public or something like that. In the meantime it has been forked
several times and yet projects like riak integrate it. Other branches are
many months old.
So would the real webmachine please stand up.
*
*
*/r
10 matches
Mail list logo