2009/7/7 Peter :
> Have you seen this blog post, which suggests one argument was simply down
> to banshee requiring less disk space (important for the Ubuntu CD-ROM):
> http://www.apebox.org/wordpress/rants/74/
>
There is one interesting experiment related to that I'd love to know
the results of,
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 1:17 PM, Jonathan Matthew wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 01:50:35PM +0200, Francesco Miglietta wrote:
>> Is it true that the ubuntu team wants to replace rhythmbox with banshee
>> on 9.10 version?
>> I love your product and i don't understand the motivations, could you
>>
On Tue, 2009-07-07 at 22:17 +1000, Jonathan Matthew wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 01:50:35PM +0200, Francesco Miglietta wrote:
> > Is it true that the ubuntu team wants to replace rhythmbox with banshee
> > on 9.10 version?
> > I love your product and i don't understand the motivations, could
On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 01:50:35PM +0200, Francesco Miglietta wrote:
> Is it true that the ubuntu team wants to replace rhythmbox with banshee
> on 9.10 version?
> I love your product and i don't understand the motivations, could you
> explain me if any?
> Has Banshee some features than Rhytm h
Is it true that the ubuntu team wants to replace rhythmbox with banshee
on 9.10 version?
I love your product and i don't understand the motivations, could you
explain me if any?
Has Banshee some features than Rhytm has not? Something thant you
couldn't add quickly to your player before the 9.10
