On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 12:32:52PM -0700, Adam Zimmerman wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-21-05 at 16:30 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > > > > Any chance of a 0.10.1 release with the current work before it gets
> > > > > the dependency on glib 2.14?
> > > >
> > > > We won't be adding a dependency on glib 2.1
On Mon, 2007-21-05 at 16:30 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > > > Any chance of a 0.10.1 release with the current work before it gets
> > > > the dependency on glib 2.14?
> > >
> > > We won't be adding a dependency on glib 2.14. We'll just use the new
> > > timeout function if glib 2.14 is availabl
> > > Any chance of a 0.10.1 release with the current work before it gets
> > > the dependency on glib 2.14?
> >
> > We won't be adding a dependency on glib 2.14. We'll just use the new
> > timeout function if glib 2.14 is available at ./configure time.
>
> How would that work for python plugins l
On Mon, 2007-21-05 at 19:21 +1000, Jonathan Matthew wrote:
> On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 09:21:31AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > Any chance of a 0.10.1 release with the current work before it gets
> > the dependency on glib 2.14?
>
> We won't be adding a dependency on glib 2.14. We'll just use th
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 09:21:31AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>
> > [g_timeout_add_seconds stuff]
>
> Hi All,
>
> This is nice work :-) Bug here
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=399012 for those who haven't
> found it.
>
> Any chance of a 0.10.1 release with the current work before
> > > Second one is in rhythmdb/rhythmdb.c in the rhythmdb_idle_poll_events,
> > > line 2003. When idle it runs the else branch every second. Not sure
> > > what it does every second but being the DB it may not be fixable.
> >
> > This is the hard one. While it is certainly fixable, it's somewhat
>
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 08:39:19AM +1000, James Doc Livingston wrote:
> > Second one is in rhythmdb/rhythmdb.c in the rhythmdb_idle_poll_events,
> > line 2003. When idle it runs the else branch every second. Not sure
> > what it does every second but being the DB it may not be fixable.
>
> This is
Hi James,
On 5/13/07, James Doc Livingston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> On Sun, 2007-05-13 at 21:19 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > I've played with this a bit more this afternoon using the blog posts
> > that you mentioned. I have no idea whether what I've found is an issue
> > but
Hi Peter,
On Sun, 2007-05-13 at 21:19 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> I've played with this a bit more this afternoon using the blog posts
> that you mentioned. I have no idea whether what I've found is an issue
> but from Federico's blog post the g_timeout_add is seems to be a
> problem. From wha
On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 09:19:38PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> Hi Bastien & all,
>
> I've played with this a bit more this afternoon using the blog posts
> that you mentioned. I have no idea whether what I've found is an issue
> but from Federico's blog post the g_timeout_add is seems to be a
> > The guys at intel have just released a tool called PowerTop
> > http://www.linuxpowertop.org (announcement to fedora-devel -
> > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-May/msg00796.html
> > )
> >
> > Anyway I installed it to play around with and noticed that rhythmbox
> > was ap
> > AFAICT from binding a strace to RB when its doing nothing there's lots
> > of gettimeofday, poll and ioctl running every second. Sample attached.
> > Not sure what else needs to be done from here.
>
> The strace is just a way to see if there are unnecessary wakeups.
> There's a gdb trick mentio
On Sun, 2007-05-13 at 14:29 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> Thanks Bastien,
>
> AFAICT from binding a strace to RB when its doing nothing there's lots
> of gettimeofday, poll and ioctl running every second. Sample attached.
> Not sure what else needs to be done from here.
The strace is just a way
> > > Anyway I installed it to play around with and noticed that rhythmbox
> > > was appearing fairly frequently even though it was idle and not
> > > playing (I forgot I even had it running). Something like 6.2% of the
> > > nearly 2500 wakeups in a second (output below).
> >
> > >3.6%
On Sun, 2007-05-13 at 13:33 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > > The guys at intel have just released a tool called PowerTop
> > > http://www.linuxpowertop.org (announcement to fedora-devel -
> > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-May/msg00796.html
> > > )
> > >
> > > Anyway I i
> > The guys at intel have just released a tool called PowerTop
> > http://www.linuxpowertop.org (announcement to fedora-devel -
> > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-May/msg00796.html
> > )
> >
> > Anyway I installed it to play around with and noticed that rhythmbox
> > was ap
On Sun, 2007-05-13 at 10:40 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> The guys at intel have just released a tool called PowerTop
> http://www.linuxpowertop.org (announcement to fedora-devel -
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-May/msg00796.html
> )
>
> Anyway I installed i
Hi All,
The guys at intel have just released a tool called PowerTop
http://www.linuxpowertop.org (announcement to fedora-devel -
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-May/msg00796.html
)
Anyway I installed it to play around with and noticed that rhythmbox
was appearing fairly fre
18 matches
Mail list logo
