Re: [PR] [SPARK-51325] Check in source code for `smallJar.jar` [spark]

2025-02-27 Thread via GitHub
vicennial commented on PR #50092: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/50092#issuecomment-2687688931 Understood. Closing this PR and holding the code changes until we have a direction based on the dev list discussion -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To res

Re: [PR] [SPARK-51325] Check in source code for `smallJar.jar` [spark]

2025-02-27 Thread via GitHub
vicennial closed pull request #50092: [SPARK-51325] Check in source code for `smallJar.jar` URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/50092 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specif

Re: [PR] [SPARK-51325] Check in source code for `smallJar.jar` [spark]

2025-02-26 Thread via GitHub
dongjoon-hyun commented on PR #50092: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/50092#issuecomment-2685993435 Thank you for pining me. However, I would recommend to participate the dev mailing list before taking any actions on code, @vicennial . -- This is an automated message from the Ap

Re: [PR] [SPARK-51325] Check in source code for `smallJar.jar` [spark]

2025-02-26 Thread via GitHub
vicennial commented on PR #50092: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/50092#issuecomment-2685944709 @dongjoon-hyun @vrozov Would a change like this where the source code is included be acceptable in keeping the JAR? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To res

[PR] [SPARK-51325] Check in source code for `smallJar.jar` [spark]

2025-02-26 Thread via GitHub
vicennial opened a new pull request, #50092: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/50092 ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? Adds source code to create `smallJar.jar`. The jar is regenerated using the source provided and it's CRC is updated. ### Why