Re: Bug#869184: dpkg: source uploads including _amd64.buildinfo cause problems

2019-06-16 Thread Ivo De Decker
Hi, Last week, Salvatore pointed me at this bug and Holger mentioned it in his talk. On Thu, May 09, 2019 at 07:24:56PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: [...] > We regularly get biten by this issue when contributors to security > uploads, most recently with the bind9 upload but as well others

testing migration aging and reproducible builds

2019-07-21 Thread Ivo De Decker
Hi reproducible builds team, The release team is planning to revisit the testing migration aging policy in the near future. The details haven't been worked out yet, but we are considering to use reproducibility of packages as one of the new factors that could influence the aging. For this to

Re: testing migration aging and reproducible builds

2019-07-22 Thread Ivo De Decker
Hi Chris, On 7/21/19 4:09 PM, Chris Lamb wrote: So, the devil is very much in the details here, alas. Whilst I am a definite +1 on this idea the day-to-day experience may not be ideal so your thoughts are very welcome. Just to take one recent example: I noticed yesterday a regression whereby on

Re: testing migration aging and reproducible builds

2019-07-22 Thread Ivo De Decker
Hi Vagrant, On 7/21/19 4:55 PM, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: I think it's: https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/reproducible-tracker.json Which only shows results for "bullseye" (formerly only "buster). We wanted to filter out the unstable and experimental suites from the tracker which may h

Re: Bug#869184: dpkg: source uploads including _amd64.buildinfo cause problems

2019-08-27 Thread Ivo De Decker
Hi, On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 01:25:51AM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > On Thu, 2018-03-01 at 15:22:30 +, Holger Levsen wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 04:05:39PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > > Any news regarding this proposal from Ansgar? We were biten now > > > several times alread