Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1068705 + pending
Bug #1068705 [diffoscope] diffoscope crashes on libscout 2.3.2-3 build on
unstable but not bullseye
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1068705: https://bu
tags 1068705 + pending
thanks
Fay Stegerman wrote:
> The attached patch avoids the crash in this case, FWIW. […]
Applied in Git with attribution taken from your email.
> I would still recommend catching the error for other cases.
Fixed as well. And it adds a nice comment displaying the issue.
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 11:28:19AM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
[...]
> Applied in Git with attribution taken from your email.
[...]
> Fixed as well. And it adds a nice comment displaying the issue.
awesome, thank you both!
--
cheers,
Holger
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-b
Hi!
On Wed, 2024-04-10 at 15:22:45 -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2024-04-09, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > I've now finished the change I had in that branch, which implements
> > support so that dpkg-buildpackage can be passed a .dsc or a source-dir,
> > and in the former will first extract it,
Package: dh-buildinfo
Version: 0.11+nmu3
X-Debbugs-Cc: hol...@debian.org
Hi,
dh-buildinfo much predates the reproducible builds effort and the
.buildinfo file and probably laid ground to it. I am now raising the
question whether it is time to get rid of dh-buildinfo in Debian.
Essentially I am a
Chris Lamb wrote:
> Please review the draft for March's Reproducible Builds report:
This has now been published — thanks to all who contributed.
If possible, please share the following link:
https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2024-03/
.. and also consider retweeting:
https://twitter.
* Holger Levsen [2024-04-11 12:54]:
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 11:28:19AM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> [...]
> > Applied in Git with attribution taken from your email.
> [...]
> > Fixed as well. And it adds a nice comment displaying the issue.
>
> awesome, thank you both!
The promised cpython issue
On 2016-12-11, Sean Whitton wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 03:12:57PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
>> I have sbuild properly set up on my machine, and I want to use it to
>> test package reproducibility. Something like this, where PWD is an
>> unpacked source package:
>>
>> 1) sbuild
>> 2) record
reprotest_0.7.27_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
reprotest_0.7.27.dsc
reprotest_0.7.27.tar.xz
reprotest_0.7.27_amd64.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
On 2024-03-08, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2023-04-12, Holger Levsen wrote:
>> i guess reprotest maybe should grow an option to do
>> --control-build /path/to/packages/
>> --vary=build_path=/use/this/build/path ...
>>to make it easier to use reprotest to com
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 15:45:44 -0700
Source: reprotest
Architecture: source
Version: 0.7.27
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Reproducible builds folks
Changed-B
11 matches
Mail list logo
