Re: Need help with getting a package to build reproducibly on arm*

Am 07.01.21 um 22:39 schrieb Michael Hudson-Doyle: I'm hardly an expert in such things but it looks to me as if gcc is ordering things differently between the two builds: https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/dbd/unstable/arm64/systemd_247.2-4.diffoscope.html#systemd-tests_---.---_arm--.

Re: Updating dpkg-buildflags to enable reproducible=+fixfilepath by default

Hi! Sorry for this late reply, but it just came into my view. On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 at 17:40, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > > On 2020-11-13, Sune Vuorela wrote: > > On 2020-10-27, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > >> Though, of course, identifying the exact reproducibility problem would > >> be preferable.

Re: Updating dpkg-buildflags to enable reproducible=+fixfilepath by default

On Fri, 8 Jan 2021 at 10:29, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > > Hi! Sorry for this late reply, but it just came into my view. > > On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 at 17:40, Vagrant Cascadian > wrote: > > > > On 2020-11-13, Sune Vuorela wrote: > > > On 2020-10-27, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > > >> T

Processing of diffoscope_164_amd64.changes

diffoscope_164_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: diffoscope_164.dsc diffoscope_164.tar.xz diffoscope_164_amd64.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org) ___ Repro

diffoscope_164_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2021 13:00:55 + Source: diffoscope Architecture: source Version: 164 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Reproducible builds folks Changed-By: Chris Lamb Changes: diffoscope (164) unst

Re: Updating dpkg-buildflags to enable reproducible=+fixfilepath by default

On 2021-01-08, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 at 17:40, Vagrant Cascadian > wrote: >> >> On 2020-11-13, Sune Vuorela wrote: >> > On 2020-10-27, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: >> >> Though, of course, identifying the exact reproducibility problem would >> >> be preferab

Re: Updating dpkg-buildflags to enable reproducible=+fixfilepath by default

Hi! [snip] > > We did a full archive rebuild testing this change, and I provided > patches to all known affected packages several months ago. It is a > one-line change in debian/rules in most cases: > > > https://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/bts-usertags.cgi?user=reproducible-builds%40lists.alioth.de

Re: Updating dpkg-buildflags to enable reproducible=+fixfilepath by default

The code that relies on __FILE__ can be found at https://sources.debian.org/src/qtbase-opensource-src/5.15.2+dfsg-2/src/testlib/qtestcase.h/#L216 So maybe we can try and get a fix there and push this change in the next stable release, after appropriately tested. -- Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez

Re: Updating dpkg-buildflags to enable reproducible=+fixfilepath by default

On Fri, 2021-01-08 at 19:23:13 -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > [snip] > > We did a full archive rebuild testing this change, and I provided > > patches to all known affected packages several months ago. It is a > > one-line change in debian/rules in most cases: > > > > > > ht

Re: Updating dpkg-buildflags to enable reproducible=+fixfilepath by default

Hi! Explicitely CCing my bug, since it seems it missed my previous reply. On Fri, 8 Jan 2021 at 20:49, Guillem Jover wrote: > > On Fri, 2021-01-08 at 19:23:13 -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer > wrote: > > [snip] > > > We did a full archive rebuild testing this change, and I provided >

Re: Updating dpkg-buildflags to enable reproducible=+fixfilepath by default

On Fri, 8 Jan 2021 at 21:15, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > > Hi! Explicitely CCing my bug, since it seems it missed my previous reply. > > On Fri, 8 Jan 2021 at 20:49, Guillem Jover wrote: > > > > On Fri, 2021-01-08 at 19:23:13 -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer > > wrote: