> Please review the draft for December's Reproducible Builds report:
Minor mistake in regards to mescc-tools-seed
We were informing you that we completed the AArch64 bootstrap to the same level
as the previous knight (on bare metal), x86 and AMD64 bootstraps.
Thus we have 4 independent bootstraps
Hi Jeremiah,
> We were informing you that we completed the AArch64 bootstrap to the
> same level as the previous knight (on bare metal), x86 and AMD64
> bootstraps. [..]
Thanks for reading over the draft; suggestions/corrections/ideas are,
of course, really important to make them effective.
Coul
Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> In unstable and experimental we do test build paths, but also pass
> DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=reproducible=+fixfilepath, which passes the
> -ffile-prefix-map=BUILDPATH=. argument, stripping the build path, but
> sometimes leaves traces; the length of the build path is different
> Could you suggest an alternative wording for that section in the report?
> Unfortunately, I don't think I can copy-> paste the text you sent, as it is
> just slightly too technical as it stands.
Then this
https://www.freelists.org/post/bootstrappable/wipfullsourcebootstrap-from-a-357byte-hex0
