We will set aside some time to be available for asking questions about
anything related to Reproducible Builds.
This is an opportunity to ask introductory questions and is intended to
be welcoming to newcomers, though of course, any questions relating to
Reproducible Builds should be fair game!
Package: src:diffoscope
Version: 162
diffoscape fails elf test with binutils from experimental, seen on amd64:
[...]
FAILED tests/comparators/test_elf.py::test_diff - AssertionError
FAILED tests/comparators/test_elf.py::test_lib_differences - AssertionError
FAILED tests/comparators/test_elf.py::t
Hello Vagrant,
On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 at 02:48, Vagrant Cascadian <
vagr...@reproducible-builds.org> wrote:
> On 2019-03-05, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > I ran Chris's script again on coccia, with the result that currently
> > 6084 source packages in the archive need a rebuild for reproducible
> > builds
I just wanted to spend a few moments looking over the progress
Reproducible Builds has made in Debian over the last few release cycles.
The percentage of packages that are reproducible admittedly doesn't look
amazing, even though there has been steady progress:
stretch 93.8%
buster 94.1%
