On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 01:36:33AM -0500, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> yep i came across all of them starting from python-lzma -- do you know
> what's the status of the "RedHat infrastructure" in debian? many (if
> not all) of those tools are relatively old, not maintained (or just in
> life support mode)
On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 4:12 AM Holger Levsen wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 01:36:33AM -0500, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> > yep i came across all of them starting from python-lzma -- do you know
> > what's the status of the "RedHat infrastructure" in debian? many (if
> > not all) of those tools are
On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 09:55:58AM -0500, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> i was mostly querying the status of it, i cant even find an ITP for dnf.
exactly.
> i was talking about removing koji entirely from debian, an RM to
> ftp.d.o; is that not what you mean?
right, this is also in order.
--
cheers,
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package diffoscope
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
# https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/
#
user debian-bts-l...@lists.debian.org
# remote status report for #949598 (http://bugs.debian.org/94959
Noticed that I can successfully build arch:all OR arch:any, but not
arch:all AND arch:any when building with sbuild.
Fails, building both arch:all and arch:any in one pass (which I think is
the default for pbuilder?):
sbuild -d UNRELEASED -c sid --no-source --arch-any --arch-all
xz-utils_5.2.4-
On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 01:36:33 -0500, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> yep i came across all of them starting from python-lzma -- do you know
> what's the status of the "RedHat infrastructure" in debian? many (if
> not all) of those tools are relatively old, not maintained (or just in
> life support mode) an
