Re: systemd reproducibility on armhf

2021-12-21 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 2:38 AM Michael Biebl wrote: > > On 13.12.21 20:44, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > It sounds like there is a compile-time check in systemd that determines > > which > > of these to use based on the host architecture, rather than the target > > architecture. > > If that was the c

Re: systemd reproducibility on armhf

2021-12-20 Thread Michael Biebl
On 13.12.21 20:44, Arnd Bergmann wrote: It sounds like there is a compile-time check in systemd that determines which of these to use based on the host architecture, rather than the target architecture. If that was the case, should we see the same problem with an amd64 kernel and i386 userland

Re: systemd reproducibility on armhf

2021-12-13 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 8:05 PM Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > > I finally did a reprotest build of systemd on armhf to try and figure > out why it doesn't build reproducibly... but it built reproducibly... > > My test did not test building with a 64-bit kernel (it was using a > 32-bit kernel in both

systemd reproducibility on armhf

2021-12-13 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
I finally did a reprotest build of systemd on armhf to try and figure out why it doesn't build reproducibly... but it built reproducibly... My test did not test building with a 64-bit kernel (it was using a 32-bit kernel in both cases), whereas the tests.reproducible-builds.org infrastructure syst