Re: maintaining reproducible-notes over the long term

2020-12-27 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Sat, Dec 26, 2020 at 01:21:10PM -0800, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > Another recent automated "--fix-deterministic" that surprised me: > > 327711ca32fb51df6580f0bbeb8c7d8f2501af90 > > At the time --fix-deterministic removed it, there were only 404 builds > for both amd64 and arm64 in unstable,

Re: maintaining reproducible-notes over the long term

2020-12-26 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
On 2020-12-18, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 09:13:21AM -0800, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: >> > Vagrant: did you perhaps notice that I (manually or automatically?) >> > removed notes for stuff that indeed shouldn't have been removed? Another recent automated "--fix-deterministic" th

Re: maintaining reproducible-notes over the long term

2020-12-18 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 09:13:21AM -0800, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > Ok. It was unclear to me which parts were automated and which parts were > manual. Oh, that's very clear. The automated ones are done at midnight UTC and the commit author says "automatic commit from ..". Everything else is me

Re: maintaining reproducible-notes over the long term

2020-12-18 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
On 2020-12-18, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 12:53:53PM +, Holger Levsen wrote: >> > yet also see value in keeping history a little easier to >> > reach than grepping through git logs. >> >> right. >> >> you also said on irc: >> >> "please wait at least until packages are

Re: maintaining reproducible-notes over the long term

2020-12-18 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 12:53:53PM +, Holger Levsen wrote: > > yet also see value in keeping history a little easier to > > reach than grepping through git logs. > > right. > > you also said on irc: > > "please wait at least until packages are verified as reproducible in > bullseye on all