Re: Please review the draft for September's report

2024-10-07 Thread Chris Lamb
Chris Lamb wrote: > Please review the draft for September's Reproducible Builds report: This has now been published — thanks to all who contributed. If possible, please share the following link: https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2024-09/ .. and also consider retweeting: https://x.co

Please review the draft for September's report

2024-10-03 Thread Chris Lamb
Hi all, Please review the draft for September's Reproducible Builds report: https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2024-09/?draft … or, via the Git repository itself: https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/reproducible-website/blob/master/_reports/2024-09.md I intend to publish it

Re: Please review the draft for September's report

2023-10-12 Thread Chris Lamb
Chris Lamb wrote: > Please review the draft for September's Reproducible Builds report: This has now been published — thanks to all who contributed. If possible, please share the following link: https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2023-09/ .. and also consider re-tweeting: https://twi

Please review the draft for September's report

2023-10-11 Thread Chris Lamb
Hi all, Please review the draft for September's Reproducible Builds report: https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2023-09/?draft … or, via the Git repository itself: https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/reproducible-website/blob/master/_reports/2023-09.md I intend to publish it

Re: Please review the draft for September's report

2022-10-07 Thread Chris Lamb
Chris Lamb wrote: > Please review the draft for September's Reproducible Builds report: This has now been published — thanks to all who contributed. If possible, please share the following link: https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2022-09/ .. and also consider retweeting: https://twit

Re: Please review the draft for September's report

2022-10-06 Thread Chris Lamb
Hi Richard^WRoland, > I've pushed 2 corrections: Thank you for these. > 2) Precision: The cannonical timestamp is for Debian, not 'an archive'. > You might want to split this now into two sentences, since the content > is not related. Ah, can you go ahead and change this yourself? You can pr

Re: Please review the draft for September's report

2022-10-05 Thread Roland Clobus
Hello Chris, On 05/10/2022 21:50, Chris Lamb wrote: Please review the draft for September's Reproducible Builds report: https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2022-09/?draft I've pushed 2 corrections: 1) The name Richard apparently sticks better than Roland ;-) 2) Precision: The cannonica

Please review the draft for September's report

2022-10-05 Thread Chris Lamb
Hi all, Please review the draft for September's Reproducible Builds report: https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2022-09/?draft … or, via the Git repository itself: https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/reproducible-website/blob/master/_reports/2022-09.md I intend to publish i

Re: Please review the draft for September's report

2021-10-06 Thread Chris Lamb
Chris Lamb wrote: > Please review the draft for September's Reproducible Builds report: This has now been published — thanks all. :) Regards, -- o ⬋ ⬊ Chris Lamb o o reproducible-builds.org 💠 ⬊ ⬋ o ___ Reprod

Re: Please review the draft for September's report

2021-10-04 Thread Holger Levsen
On Mon, Oct 04, 2021 at 10:54:19PM +, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Mon, Oct 04, 2021 at 10:34:03PM -, Chris Lamb wrote: > > Sorry for the slight delay; been under the weather over the weekend. Anyway, > > please review the draft for September's Reproducible Builds report: > > https://reprodu

Re: Please review the draft for September's report

2021-10-04 Thread Holger Levsen
hi, On Mon, Oct 04, 2021 at 10:34:03PM -, Chris Lamb wrote: > Sorry for the slight delay; been under the weather over the weekend. Anyway, > please review the draft for September's Reproducible Builds report: > https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2021-09/?draft jenkins is also not doing

Please review the draft for September's report

2021-10-04 Thread Chris Lamb
Hi all, Sorry for the slight delay; been under the weather over the weekend. Anyway, please review the draft for September's Reproducible Builds report: https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2021-09/?draft … or, via the Git repository itself: https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/

Re: Please review the draft for September's report

2020-10-05 Thread Chris Lamb
Chris Lamb wrote: > Please review the draft for September's Reproducible Builds report: This has now been published. Please share the following URLs: https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2020-09/ https://twitter.com/ReproBuilds/status/1313069476653522945 Regards, -- o ⬋ ⬊

Please review the draft for September's report

2020-10-02 Thread Chris Lamb
Hi all, Please review the draft for September's Reproducible Builds report: https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2020-09/?draft … or, via the Git repository itself: https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/reproducible-website/blob/master/_reports/2020-09.md I intend to publish it

Re: Please review the draft for September's report

2019-10-05 Thread Chris Lamb
Chris Lamb wrote: > Please review the draft for September's Reproducible Builds report: This has now been published; many thanks to all who contributed. Please share the following URL: https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2019-09/ Alternatively, if you are into that kind of thing, please

Re: [rb-general] Please review the draft for September's report

2019-10-03 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2019-10-03 at 11:20 +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: > Hi all, > > Please review the draft for September's Reproducible Builds report: > > https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2019-09/?draft > > … or, via the Git respository itself: > > > https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/rep

Please review the draft for September's report

2019-10-03 Thread Chris Lamb
Hi all, Please review the draft for September's Reproducible Builds report: https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2019-09/?draft … or, via the Git respository itself: https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/reproducible-website/blob/master/_reports/2019-09.md I intend to publish it