Re: Please review the draft for February's report

Chris Lamb wrote: > Please review the draft for February's Reproducible Builds report: This has now been published — thanks to all who contributed. If possible, please share the following link: https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2025-02/ .. and also consider retweeting: https://x.com

Please review the draft for February's report

Hi all, Please review the draft for February's Reproducible Builds report: https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2025-02/?draft … or, via the Git repository itself: https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/reproducible-website/blob/master/_reports/2025-02.md I intend to publish it n

Re: Please review the draft for February's report

Chris Lamb wrote: > Please review the draft for February's Reproducible Builds report: This has now been published — thanks to all who contributed. If possible, please share the following link: https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2024-02/ .. and also consider retweeting: https://twitt

Please review the draft for February's report

Hi all, Please review the draft for February's Reproducible Builds report: https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2024-02/?draft … or, via the Git repository itself: https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/reproducible-website/blob/master/_reports/2024-02.md I intend to publish it

Re: Please review the draft for February's report

Chris Lamb wrote: > Please review the draft for February's Reproducible Builds report: This has now been published — thanks to all who contributed. If possible, please share the following link: https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2023-02/ .. and also consider retweeting: https://twitt

Please review the draft for February's report

Hi all, Please review the draft for February's Reproducible Builds report: https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2023-02/?draft … or, via the Git repository itself: https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/reproducible-website/blob/master/_reports/2023-02.md I intend to publish it

Re: Please review the draft for February's report

Chris Lamb wrote: > Please review the draft for February's Reproducible Builds report: This has now been published; thanks to all who contributed. Please share the following link: https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2022-02/ ... and perhaps consider retweeting: https://twitter.com/Repr

Please review the draft for February's report

Hi all, Please review the draft for February's Reproducible Builds report: https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2022-02/?draft … or, via the Git repository itself: https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/reproducible-website/blob/master/_reports/2022-02.md I intend to publish it n

Re: Please review the draft for February's report

Chris Lamb wrote: > Please review the draft for February's Reproducible Builds report: This has now been published; many thanks to all who contributed. Please share the following URL: https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2021-02/ Alternatively, if you are into that kind of thing, please c

Please review the draft for February's report

Hi all, Please review the draft for February's Reproducible Builds report: https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2021-02/?draft … or, via the Git repository itself: https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/reproducible-website/blob/master/_reports/2021-02.md I intend to publish it

Re: Please review the draft for February's report

Chris Lamb wrote: > Please review the draft for February's Reproducible Builds report: This has now been published; many thanks to all who contributed. Please share the following URL: https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2020-02/ Alternatively, if you are into that kind of thing, please c

Please review the draft for February's report

Hi all, Please review the draft for February's Reproducible Builds report: https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2020-02/?draft … or, via the Git repository itself: https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/reproducible-website/blob/master/_reports/2020-02.md I intend to publish it n