Bug#1019742: reprotest: add a variation that sets DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck

2022-09-16 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 12:14:05PM +0200, Philip Hands wrote: > BTW If someone can give me a hint where in the code one would define > such a variation I'll cheerfully give it a go myself, but sadly it seems > that my python is too weak to find the right spot for myself. The variations are defined

Bug#1019742: reprotest: add a variation that sets DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck

2022-09-15 Thread Philip Hands
Vagrant Cascadian writes: > On 2022-09-14, Philip Hands wrote: >> Vagrant Cascadian writes: >> but also (given that the tests will have passed during the normal build) the tests failing during the varied build seems unlikely to be identifying faults that are worth fixin

Bug#1019742: reprotest: add a variation that sets DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck

2022-09-14 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
On 2022-09-14, Philip Hands wrote: > Vagrant Cascadian writes: > >>> but also >>> (given that the tests will have passed during the normal build) the tests >>> failing during the varied build seems unlikely to be identifying faults >>> that are >>> worth fixing, and so is just a waste of cycles.

Bug#1019742: reprotest: add a variation that sets DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck

2022-09-14 Thread Philip Hands
Vagrant Cascadian writes: >> but also >> (given that the tests will have passed during the normal build) the tests >> failing during the varied build seems unlikely to be identifying faults that >> are >> worth fixing, and so is just a waste of cycles. > > How do you know weather the bugs it is

Bug#1019742: reprotest: add a variation that sets DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck

2022-09-14 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
On 2022-09-14, Philip Hands wrote: > I suggest adding a 'nocheck' variation, that sets DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck > during the build, Sounds reasonable! > and enabling it by default. Less sure... > The reason for doing so is that one could imagine that a package produces > differing results depe

Bug#1019742: reprotest: add a variation that sets DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck

2022-09-14 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi Phil, On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 04:00:04PM +0200, Philip Hands wrote: > I suggest adding a 'nocheck' variation, that sets DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck > during the build, and enabling it by default. [...] > Option 2) is what I'm suggesting making into a default variation. [...] > If nothing else it

Bug#1019742: reprotest: add a variation that sets DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck

2022-09-14 Thread Philip Hands
Package: reprotest Version: 0.7.22 Severity: wishlist I suggest adding a 'nocheck' variation, that sets DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck during the build, and enabling it by default. The reason for doing so is that one could imagine that a package produces differing results depending upon whether the te