Hi,
Mattia Rizzolo (2022-03-09):
> On Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 01:51:41AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Reproducible Builds folks
> > (2022-03-09):
> > > 2022-03-08 01:09
> > > https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/unstable/amd64/haveged
> > > changed from reproducible -> FTBFS
> >
>
On 2022-03-09, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Reproducible Builds folks
> (2022-03-09):
>> The reproducibility status of the package haveged changed during the
>> continuous testing.
>> See the following notes for more details:
>>
>> 2022-03-08 01:09
>> https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/un
Hello Cyril,
On Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 01:51:41AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Reproducible Builds folks
> (2022-03-09):
> > 2022-03-08 01:09
> > https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/unstable/amd64/haveged changed
> > from reproducible -> FTBFS
>
> Let's do that: a pointer to the CI
Hi,
Reproducible Builds folks
(2022-03-09):
> The reproducibility status of the package haveged changed during the
> continuous testing.
> See the following notes for more details:
>
> 2022-03-08 01:09
> https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/unstable/amd64/haveged changed
> from reprod
Package: reprotest
Version: 0.7.19
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-salsa...@alioth-lists.debian.net
Hi there!
Let's suppose that someone wants to pass some arguments to
dpkg-buildpackage called by reprotest, as reported here:
https://salsa.debian.org/salsa-ci-team/pipeline/-/issues/245
A
