Dear Sir/Madam,
ATOS group companies are leaders in digital services with proforma annual
revenue of circa ? 13 billion and circa 100,000 employees in 73 countries,
serving a global client base.
We strive to create the firm of the future. We believe that bringing together people,
business &
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 888237 + pending
Bug #888237 [src:diffoscope] Make it more obvious when fuzzy matching is not
available
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
888237: https://bugs.debian.org/c
tags 888237 + pending
thanks
Fixed in Git, pending upload:
https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/diffoscope/commit/292895cad5c5304cb865f69e980e4edccca2cf0e
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
___
Hi Gilles,
> I didn’t try any other file format, but will definitely do and get back to
> you!
Any update on this? :) Please do note that tracking of this issue
has "moved" to:
https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/diffoscope/issues/10
.. so please do respond there.
Best wishe
Mapping stretch to stable.
Mapping stable to proposed-updates.
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 17:27:42 +0100
Source: diffoscope
Binary: diffoscope
Architecture: source all
Version: 78+deb9u1
Distribution: stretch
Urgency: medium
Maint
diffoscope_78+deb9u1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
diffoscope_78+deb9u1.dsc
diffoscope_78+deb9u1.tar.xz
diffoscope_78+deb9u1_all.deb
diffoscope_78+deb9u1_amd64.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #925051 [src:diffoscope] diffoscope: FTBFS in stretch (failing tests)
Added tag(s) pending.
--
925051: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=925051
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
__
Control: tag -1 pending
On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 03:29:52PM -0400, Chris Lamb wrote:
> > Ok, but this still should be fixed in stretch, right?
> > (Packages in stretch must build in stretch).
>
> Sure thing, but this would require a stable update which seems a
> little overkill, especially at this
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 04:13:46PM -0400, Chris Lamb wrote:
> > The relevant thing, IMO, is that proposed-updates and point
> > releases still exist for stretch, so I don't see it overkill
>
> Sure. Can you still loop the SRMs in on this before I backport this
> patch and create a stretchpu b
