On Tue, 2018-07-31 at 10:40:08 +0800, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2018-07-31, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > On Tue, 2018-07-31 at 08:29:33 +0800, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> > And yeah, I also kind of understand gcc's upstream position, that if
> > you unconditionally embed all build flags into your re
On 2018-07-31, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-07-31 at 08:29:33 +0800, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> I've got a dpkg patch which makes use of -ffile-prefix-map. I haven't
>> found a good test case yet... package that fails to build reproducibly
>> due to using __FILE__, __BASE_FILE__, or __built
Hi Guillem,
> Also AIUI this divergence and the lack of forward porting is the
> reason the repro buildds are currently stopped?
(Indeed — see https://reproducible-builds.org/blog/posts/170/, 4th
paragraph…)
> From my side, I see no problem with merging something like the
> attached patch if it
Hi!
On Tue, 2018-07-31 at 08:29:33 +0800, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> With gcc 8 being the default compiler in debian now, we should be able
> to use -ffile-prefix-map, which should handle *some* of the cases that
> BUILD_PATH_PREFIX_MAP is intended to solve. It definitely won't help
> with things
With gcc 8 being the default compiler in debian now, we should be able
to use -ffile-prefix-map, which should handle *some* of the cases that
BUILD_PATH_PREFIX_MAP is intended to solve. It definitely won't help
with things that embed the gcc commandline into arguments.
But since we've been unable
Hi Christoph!
On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 08:37:58AM +0200, Christoph Biedl wrote:
> after a somewhat bumpy experience following the upload of the previous
> upstream release of file (5.33), I eventually decided to introduce a
> release procedure for src:file in Debian: New upstream release uploads
>
Chris Lamb wrote:
> Please review the draft for week 170's blog post [..]
This has now been published; many thanks to all who contributed!
Please share the following URL:
https://reproducible-builds.org/blog/posts/170/
Alternatively, if you are into that kind of thing, please consider
retwee
