diffoscope 94 MIGRATED to testing

2018-05-08 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the diffoscope source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 93 Current version: 94 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later

Re: Please review the draft for week 158's blog post

2018-05-08 Thread Holger Levsen
On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 05:01:59PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: > That's how I originally interepreted your query. I feel the trade-off > between it being accidentally intepreted a "sulk" and it attracting > meaningful results (not mere community support) means we should err > on the side of omitting i

Re: Please review the draft for week 158's blog post

2018-05-08 Thread Chris Lamb
Hi Holger, > we could have a paragraph "you might be wondering about why less things > have recently happened in the reproducible builds efforts and this is > because lack of funding. Please contact us if you can help us getting > our work funded again." That's how I originally interepreted your

Re: [rb-general] Please review the draft for week 158's blog post

2018-05-08 Thread Chris Lamb
Chris Lamb wrote: > Please review the draft for week 158's blog post [..] This has now been published; many thanks to all who contributed! Please share the following URL: https://reproducible-builds.org/blog/posts/158/ Alternatively, if you are into that kind of thing, please consider retwee

Re: Please review the draft for week 158's blog post

2018-05-08 Thread Holger Levsen
On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 07:55:39PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: > > looks good to me, though suprisingly short. > Well, alas, there's not much I can do about that at report-writing > timeā€¦ sure. > > and now I wonder whether we should mention again that we lack funding > > atm, which hugely contribut